Live data from Hacker News

Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

bluewin.ch

31–40 of 57 posts

Re: Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

#31
post #3
post #2

I need to FIRE, so that I can spend my time making informative ` .bs` Web sites, in the public interest. `.bs` is the best TLD since the one that made `jabber.at` possible.

unfortunately, they know what they've got! Gandi has .bs renewing at $400 per year!

.sucks is "only" $200!

Re: Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

#33
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Voters in Northern Ireland younger than 45 years prefer joining Ireland than staying in the UK, which means that .uk will stop being relevant within 50 years at most, once all boomers die.

The country would still be called United Kingdom if it contained three constituent provinces instead of four

I think the argument comes from the full title being "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". If you drop NI then the other three countries can already be grouped under the Great Britain term.

Re: Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

#35

It should be possible to geofence it such that requests from within Switzerland are redirected to the correct address.

Right, why would anybody ever legitimately want to access that portal from outside switzerland? /s

Geofencing is a typical techie "solution" that solves nothing and only brings headache to people.

Re: Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

#36
post #21

Ahh unchecked websites in print. Two of my favourites are: - The recent (Nov '24) mishap from Mattel printing a p*rn site on their Wicked dolls: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gz91pp5llo - Or the numerous 'Click Here' or unreasonable long (e.g. https://example.gov.uk/some/sub/site/dGhlbi9hL3JlYWxseS9sb25... ) that have appeared in UK government or NHS leaflets.

> p*rn Who are you doing this for? All the small children on HN who will be scandalized reading the word "porn" but are safe so long as the "o" is censored with an asterisk?

Why do you follow your question by a refutation of the supposed response ? They probably doing it for themselves like people saying « gosh ». If you find that ridicule fine, but no need to strawman their intentions. You chances to get an honest, non defensive response are pretty low.

Re: Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

#37
post #21

Ahh unchecked websites in print. Two of my favourites are: - The recent (Nov '24) mishap from Mattel printing a p*rn site on their Wicked dolls: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gz91pp5llo - Or the numerous 'Click Here' or unreasonable long (e.g. https://example.gov.uk/some/sub/site/dGhlbi9hL3JlYWxseS9sb25... ) that have appeared in UK government or NHS leaflets.

> p*rn Who are you doing this for? All the small children on HN who will be scandalized reading the word "porn" but are safe so long as the "o" is censored with an asterisk?

The obvious answer is that this user likely also comments on other platforms that do not allow using the word openly and instead of the mental overload of constantly deciding which site does and doesn’t allow spelling out the word they choose the safer option in every case.

Or their autocorrect has now learnt to respell it anyways.

Or, they didn’t really spend hours debating the pros and cons of using either spelling and just went with whatever felt ok at the time.

But why choose generosity when one can choose snarky ass instead.

Re: Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

#38
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Voters in Northern Ireland younger than 45 years prefer joining Ireland than staying in the UK, which means that .uk will stop being relevant within 50 years at most, once all boomers die.

Rename it to “United Kingdom of England and Scotland” and party like it’s 1707. Problem solved.

[angry Welsh noises]

Re: Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

#39
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> p*rn Who are you doing this for? All the small children on HN who will be scandalized reading the word "porn" but are safe so long as the "o" is censored with an asterisk?

The obvious answer is that this user likely also comments on other platforms that do not allow using the word openly and instead of the mental overload of constantly deciding which site does and doesn’t allow spelling out the word they choose the safer option in every case. Or their autocorrect has now learnt to respell it anyways. Or, they didn’t really spend hours debating the pros and cons of using either spelling…

I don't think bhaney was being snarky. Censoring words that don't need censoring seems to me to be a recent phenomena. I'm glad there is push back.

Re: Basel has to buy domain name in the Bahamas after mishap

#40
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The obvious answer is that this user likely also comments on other platforms that do not allow using the word openly and instead of the mental overload of constantly deciding which site does and doesn’t allow spelling out the word they choose the safer option in every case. Or their autocorrect has now learnt to respell it anyways. Or, they didn’t really spend hours debating the pros and cons of using either spelling…

I don't think bhaney was being snarky. Censoring words that don't need censoring seems to me to be a recent phenomena. I'm glad there is push back.

Language evolves over time as a result of societal pressures. That’s what we are seeing here, and it has been happening since before recorded time.
Post reply on HN