Live data from Hacker News

In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

nicky.bearblog.dev

31–40 of 56 posts

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#31
> CGP Grey has a monolithic OmniFocus build that uses perspectives to really nail down what needs/can be done this second.

I highly recommend the early episodes of the Cortex podcast where CGP Grey talks about his system. I discovered that his brain works in roughly the same way as mine, and so I was able to apply a lot of his insights to make my own system better.

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#32
First, 'doing the damn work' all day feels horrible. You need to do some self-assigned and self-guided work during the day to not feel like an assembly line worker.

Second, tweaking your local setup is more like 'ergonomics' then 'productivity'. Working with more ergonomic setup may yield the same output, but it's more enjoyable.

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#33

The idea of having a system or process is to be able to; - be intentional, consciously engage, and be present. - participate by being active rather than passive. - be consistent and reliable in timing, expectation, and quality. - be finite by constraint around time, effort, or action. If one wants just to keep winging it, it is still a choice and OK to be that.

That’s me. I wing it. I do this because I believe productivity as such is not a virtue. I’m interested in creative breakthroughs, not maximizing any predictable or conceivable variable.

> I’m interested in creative breakthroughs, not maximizing any predictable or conceivable variable.

Most jobs and tasks in life don't need any "creative breakthroughs". The article is discussing scheduling, task prioritization and management. Fix this bug, implement this feature, schedule this doctor's appointment, do the dishes, buy toilet paper. No breakthroughs needed for those, creative or otherwise :)

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s me. I wing it. I do this because I believe productivity as such is not a virtue. I’m interested in creative breakthroughs, not maximizing any predictable or conceivable variable.

> I’m interested in creative breakthroughs, not maximizing any predictable or conceivable variable. Most jobs and tasks in life don't need any "creative breakthroughs". The article is discussing scheduling, task prioritization and management. Fix this bug, implement this feature, schedule this doctor's appointment, do the dishes, buy toilet paper. No breakthroughs needed for those, creative or otherwise :)

I strongly believe in writing things down. But not so much in having a specific routine for it. The only criteria I have is to make it visible according to context. Some time I use Reminders.app, or I message myself in WA. I may also use an org file or my physical notebook. it’s pretty much the same as notes, I want them to be contextually visible. I don’t care to have a perfect filing system.

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#35
post #21

When you know what needs to be done, you don't need "productivity", you just need to work. When you don't know what needs to be done, no amount of "productivity" will compensate for the fact that any work you do is meaningless and any result thereof accidental.

That's simplifying things a bit too far. For a lot of people, the required productivity system is exactly what's needed to enable them to "just work". For example Pomodoro timer is in that category. Unfortunately conveying what's happening in your brain to other people is really tricky.

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#36
post #8

In my mind all these productivity systems cook down to creating a list of tasks. The list can be between 4 and 10 items. You do one task at a time and when you are finished you can cross out the task. This is the extent of focus my brain is capable of. Creating giant backlogs and plans is just | /dev/null in my case.

A giant backlog of tasks can help with strategizing a long-lived project. But I classify them as planning material, and when doing, I just create a new list based on them.

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#37
post #32

First, 'doing the damn work' all day feels horrible. You need to do some self-assigned and self-guided work during the day to not feel like an assembly line worker. Second, tweaking your local setup is more like 'ergonomics' then 'productivity'. Working with more ergonomic setup may yield the same output, but it's more enjoyable.

Interesting. I feel far happier when I am able to just "do the damn work" all day. Instead, I find I am constantly having to pander to the onslaught of stakeholders who require constant meticulous management to give me the space to do the damn work. I can hardly get into a flow state anymore because of the heavy layer of management and dependencies.

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#38

"Productivity isn’t about shiny tools. It is about getting things done." Earlier in my career I went on all sorts of productivity boosting courses and read loads of books...in the end only one thing has stuck and that's the 2 minute rule from David Allen. In short, if a tasks hits you and you can get it done in 2mins or less just do it there and then. Explained in his voice here for those interested - https://www.you…

I've found that a problem I've had is that a "2 minute task" is sometimes, for me, estimated to be a 20+ minute task. When I actually got out a watch and timed it, I was like "oh shit, that was not even a fraction of my estimate". So it's the estimation , not the actual task length/difficulty that is sometimes a problem for me.

Precisely. This is how “mount my monitor on the monitor arm I had lying around” became “ream an 8mm hole in my desk”, “find an 8mm drill bit”, “rig a screw driver to ream out the whole by hand”, “ask coworker for a sleeve to make a sleeve for the bolt so it stays still on my desk”, “ream out the brass shell casing he gave me”.

However, after spending 2 hours doing that, I went and did a bunch of stuff I’d been procrastinating doing that were high priority with seemingly way more energy and focus.

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#39

I threw away all my personal productivity crap a couple years ago and still get the same amount of stuff done. I just converted the fiddling time into free time.

Would you say fiddling time was in some way pleasing for you? Maybe it was free time all along and still is for people who like that?

Re: In Defence of 'Productivity Crap'

#40
post #21

When you know what needs to be done, you don't need "productivity", you just need to work. When you don't know what needs to be done, no amount of "productivity" will compensate for the fact that any work you do is meaningless and any result thereof accidental.

Figuring out what needs to be done is itself work though, and for many people it is the type of work that productivity tools can greatly help with.
Post reply on HN