Live data from Hacker News

Who killed the rave?

ft.com

31–40 of 854 posts

Re: Who killed the rave?

#31
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I'm in the UK and there are still regular late night dance / EDM nights in my city. I was at one a couple of weekends ago, 11pm - 4am. A good mix of ages too, people clearly in their 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s. Everyone having a great time, I would guess at least 70% of the people were on something too, (MDMA, Ecstasy etc).

MDMA and Ecstasy are the same thing afaik

I wonder if what's being called ecstacy is something else entirely now? I feel so out of the loop.

Re: Who killed the rave?

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MDMA and Ecstasy are the same thing afaik

I wonder if what's being called ecstacy is something else entirely now? I feel so out of the loop.

I used that word with a young lady who said she was going to a rave and she couldn't stop laughing. It was like I'd suggested a tea-dance.

Re: Who killed the rave?

#35
post #4
post #3

Related Berlin's beat goes quiet as techno clubs close their doors (3 points, 2 months ago, no comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42149813 https://archive.is/BdJlM (Better Watergate photos)

There was also a big thread - Berlin's famed nightclubs, losing customers, face an uncertain future (300 comments) - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38151205 14 years ago - Berlins new techno beat. why international tech startups should move to berlin - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2729524 (Article is gone so not sure if it's a play on techno)

last article archived here: https://archive.ph/20121024051203/http://www.cnbcmagazine.co... Yeah, it's not really about techno music or rave scene, though it briefly mentions the Berlin nightlife. It is about tech work jobs and startups.

Re: Who killed the rave?

#36
I dunno about globally but daylight music festivals killed them for me back around 2005. Raves are about staying up all night in a dark room with good friends, good EDM, flashy lights, suggestive clothing and questionable substances. Take away the 'dark room' part and and turf the rest out onto a sports field at 11am and it's ruined.

Re: Who killed the rave?

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MDMA and Ecstasy are the same thing afaik

I wonder if what's being called ecstacy is something else entirely now? I feel so out of the loop.

PSA: Ebeneezer Goode by The Shamen was released 32 years ago in 1992.

Re: Who killed the rave?

#38
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I'm in the UK and there are still regular late night dance / EDM nights in my city. I was at one a couple of weekends ago, 11pm - 4am. A good mix of ages too, people clearly in their 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s. Everyone having a great time, I would guess at least 70% of the people were on something too, (MDMA, Ecstasy etc).

MDMA and Ecstasy are the same thing afaik

I always thought calling it MDMA denoted more purity vs Ecstasy, but I was never a candy kid.

Re: Who killed the rave?

#40
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The article also mentions that earlier ending events made to accommodate aging millennials have seen an unexpected and huge interest from Gen Z But yeah, the decline of the nightlife and hospitality sector is what this article is about, as the regulated rave experience is very mainstream and has been for a long time now The production value is quite high now and still improving so I don't see why the illicit rave exp…

> I don't see why the illicit rave experience would be so interesting when the facilities would be so lacking in comparison. I swear if you strip away legal pot and LGBTQ rights (not saying those are bad) we have culturally returned to the 1950s. This is a very conservative period with little interest in or tolerance for actual outside-the-lines culture or experience.

I don’t get that impression here in California

I have noticed that after normalizing anything, counterculture areas of California will always have something even more unfamiliar trying to get tolerated and representation

But I don’t see what you’re referring to

I think there is a disinterest in illicit raves because the market has reached parity and beyond for the experience that the market actually enjoyed. If it fails to do that or the illegal raves are better again, I think there is still interest in that, far bigger than whatever was happening in the 90s

Post reply on HN