Live data from Hacker News

Why we use our own hardware

fastmail.com

31–40 of 547 posts

Re: Why we use our own hardware

#31
post #24
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To avoid sysadmin tasks, and keep costs down, you've got to go so deep in the cloud, that it becomes just another arcane skill set. I run most of my stuff on virtual Linux servers, but some on AWS, and that's hard to learn, and doesn't transfer to GCP or Azure. Unless your needs are extreme, I think sysadmin'ing is the easier route in most cases.

I predict a slow but unstoppable comeback of the sysadmin job over the next 5-10 years.

It never disappeared in some places. In my region there's been zero interest in "the cloud" because of physical remoteness from all major GCP/AWS/Azure datacenters (resulting in high latency), for compliance reasons, and because it's easier and faster to solve problems by dealing with a local company than pleading with a global giant that gives zero shits about you because you're less than a rounding error in its books.

Re: Why we use our own hardware

#32
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a "Report Spam" function which is two clicks away (it's in the "More" menu).

That's like Spotify telling me "keep disliking" when I complained to them why songs from a certain language (which I never liked or listened to and I certainly don't speak) keeps filling the home after I told them in the first complaint that I have been doing that since months.

What can I say, "Report Spam" seems to work for me. I'm just a customer of Fastmail.

Re: Why we use our own hardware

#33
post #11

[flagged]

This last week, gmail failed to filter as spam an email with subject "#T Anitra", body,

> oF1 d 4440 - 2 B 32677 83

> R Teri E x E q

>

> k 50347733 Safoorabegum

and an attachment "7330757559.pdf". It let through 8 similar emails in the same week, and many more even more egregiously gibberish emails over the years. I'm not pleased with the quality of gmail's spam filter.

Re: Why we use our own hardware

#34

Why is it surprising? It's well known cloud is 3 times the price.

Nobody said it's surprising though, they are well aware of it having done it for more than two decades. Many newcomers are not aware of it though, as their default is "cloud" and they never even shopped for servers, colocation or looked around on the dedicated server market.

Re: Why we use our own hardware

#35
post #11

[flagged]

I get no spam on fastmail, I assume this is because I never give out my email to anyone and creating new ones for every interaction. This way I keep track of who I'm interacting with and also who's selling my alias emails.

Just wish there was a decent way to do this with mobile numbers!

Re: Why we use our own hardware

#37
post #8
post #3

Such an awesome article. I like how they didn't just go with the Cloud wave but kept sysadmin'ing, like ol' Unix graybeards. Two interesting things they wrote about their SSDs: 1) "At this rate, we’ll replace these [SSD] drives due to increased drive sizes, or entirely new physical drive formats (such E3.S which appears to finally be gaining traction) long before they get close to their rated write capacity." and 2)…

To avoid sysadmin tasks, and keep costs down, you've got to go so deep in the cloud, that it becomes just another arcane skill set. I run most of my stuff on virtual Linux servers, but some on AWS, and that's hard to learn, and doesn't transfer to GCP or Azure. Unless your needs are extreme, I think sysadmin'ing is the easier route in most cases.

For so many things the cloud isn't really easier or cheaper, and most cloud providers stopped advertising it as such. My assumption is that cloud adoption is mainly driven by 3 forces:

- for small companies: free credits

- for large companies: moving prices as far away as possible from the deploy button, allowing dev and it to just deploy stuff without purchase orders

- self-perpetuating due to hype, cv-driven development, and ease of hiring

All of these are decent reasons, but none of them may apply to a company like fastmail

Re: Why we use our own hardware

#39
post #14

I absolutely love Fastmail. I moved off of Gmail years ago with zero regrets. Better UI, better apps, better company, and need I say better service? I still maintain and fetch from a Gmail account so it all just works seamlessly for receiving and sending Gmail, so you don’t have to give anything up either.

I use Fastmail for my personal mail, and I don’t regret it, but I’m not quite as sold as you are, I guess maybe because I still have a few Google work accounts I need to use. Spam filtering in Fastmail is a little worse, and the search is _terrible_. The iOS app is usable but buggy. The easy masked emails are a big win though, and setting up new domains feels like less of a hassle with FM. I don’t regret using Fastmail, and I’d use them again for my personal email, but it doesn’t feel like a slam dunk.

Re: Why we use our own hardware

#40

But what about the cost and complexity of a room with the racks and the cooling needs of running these machines? And the uninterrupted power setup? The wiring mess behind the racks.

I'm not fastmail but this is not rocket science. Has everyone forgotten how datacentre services work in 2024?
Post reply on HN