Earlier quoted context omitted.
it's not unsanitary on your plates, why should it be on your skin?
Your plates can be washed with temperatures that would scald you and with chemicals that dissolve your skin. But you don’t want to sanitise your skin, just get the dirt off, so I don’t see any real issues.
A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
31–40 of 217 posts
Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#32Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#33Before I clicked through, I was hoping this was going to be about right-to-repair washing machines for clothing.
Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#34Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#35Truly remarkable creative thinking in a way that does not exist today. This was a year after humans landed on the Moon, and I can understand the inspiration that drove the 70s.
Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#36Before I clicked through, I was hoping this was going to be about right-to-repair washing machines for clothing.
Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#37[flagged]
Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#38I can see why this didn't catch on, but on the other hand, I kinda want one.
Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#39And the hair?
Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970
#40> After five minutes of that, the machine would then fill the chamber with hot water for a three-minute ultrasonic bath. This was followed by a two-minute hot rinse cycle. Next, the chamber would drain and the user was blasted with warm air to dry off. They were additionally exposed to both infrared and ultraviolet light to kill germs. All in all, it was a 15-minute cycle. It's apparently also a tanning booth. 15 min…