Live data from Hacker News

USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

usgs.gov

31–40 of 237 posts

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would assume any positive effects are balanced out by living in Arkansas.

People downvoted you to the point that your comment is grayed out and about to be hidden but there is hardly metric by which Arkansas is not in the bottom ten on a list of states. Infant mortality rate? 3rd most deadly for babies. Poverty rate? 7th poorest. Homicide rate? 7th most dangerous. Obesity rate? 3rd fattest. Practically any map of any measurable statistic where states are colored red for "bad" and green for…

People vote in good faith, I presume. Sometimes a comment’s factual basis matters less than its overall contribution to a productive and open discussion. Downvotes in this case are an example of HN’s surprisingly effective system for self-moderation working as it should. It isn’t vile enough to censor, but it also isn’t what a lot of readers come here for. It didn’t personally offend me (I didn’t vote either way), but I take occasional downvoting that I don’t fully agree with in stride, as the overall system seems to work better than most.

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#32
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would assume any positive effects are balanced out by living in Arkansas.

My only experience with Arkansas was waking up to a speeding ticket at 3 in the morning. Who puts out a speed trap at 3 in the fucking morning? But if it’s anything like Oklahoma…

I would have guessed better results in the 1am to 2am time slot, but 3am is not totally out of line. I bet the fraction of drivers at 3am that are drunk is much higher than at, say, 3pm.

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would assume any positive effects are balanced out by living in Arkansas.

People downvoted you to the point that your comment is grayed out and about to be hidden but there is hardly metric by which Arkansas is not in the bottom ten on a list of states. Infant mortality rate? 3rd most deadly for babies. Poverty rate? 7th poorest. Homicide rate? 7th most dangerous. Obesity rate? 3rd fattest. Practically any map of any measurable statistic where states are colored red for "bad" and green for…

> But it is rude to point that out.

No, that is not rude at all. Making a flippant derogatory remark gets downvotes, people like to see numbers. Like the ones you just gave...

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#34
post #27
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My only experience with Arkansas was waking up to a speeding ticket at 3 in the morning. Who puts out a speed trap at 3 in the fucking morning? But if it’s anything like Oklahoma…

Um, why were you waking up while driving at 3 in the morning?

Happened to me on Ambien.

Re: USGS uses machine learning to show large lithium potential in Arkansas

#36

Serious question: Given the mood alerting properties of lithium, are people living here chiller than would be expected (controlling for instance for poverty / SES) ?

I am not a health researcher or anyting, but a quick googling seems to suggest its possible that it lowers risks of suicide[0] and other affective disorders, which by extension it would lower the rates of issues that can contribute to these issues I'd think. That said, I honestly am unsure. It also is a requisite that it must be in the water in sufficient but low amounts [0]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32716281/

It also shrinks your white matter I think, and has other gigantic bad effects.

Source: am bipolar and take 600mg daily.

Post reply on HN