Since will come up, Thiels response to some of current geopolitical critiques of Palantir: https://youtu.be/bNewfkhhwMo?t=3755
Reflections on Palantir
31–40 of 658 posts
Re: Reflections on Palantir
#32It’s Salesforce v2. A ridiculously expensive proprietary “easy-to-build” application platform with an ecosystem of ridiculously expensive consultants.
Re: Reflections on Palantir
#33Re: Reflections on Palantir
#34> you can work on things like Google search or the Facebook news feed, all of which seem like marginally good things lol, where has the author been in the past decade? both of those are bad, especially the feed algorithms are scientifically proven to have a strong influence on the decline of trust into democratic institutions
Re: Reflections on Palantir
#35[flagged]
Re: Reflections on Palantir
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can you type something like this after the numerous independent reports of IDF behaviour, civilian casualties in Gaza, and the treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank? I can't believe anybody can just ignore reality like that.
Can you define the term "genocide"?
Re: Reflections on Palantir
#37Re: Reflections on Palantir
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
What does this historical population trend have to do with the genocide being perpetrated by Israel in Gaza in retaliation for October 7th, 2023?
[flagged]
blatant lie, as has been pointed out to you multiple times now
Re: Reflections on Palantir
#39246 PE, with a $94B market cap. https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/PLTR/ Alex Karp has something figured out. The investor class loves him.
Palantir has $0.09 earnings per share. 2023 was the first year they were profitable. So P/E isn't the right metric to look at here.
Also no investor ever trades on _trailing_ metrics. It's all about forward earnings, but 99.999999% of valuation multiples you see online are trailing metrics (or use questionable forward estimates pulled from some aggregate which is also just noise instead of actually diligencing estimates)
Re: Reflections on Palantir
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even the most pessimistic estimates of casualties in Gaza are on the order of tens of thousands. That is not going to appreciably change the population.
No, the most pessimistic casualty numbers are in the 180k+ range, including all of the missing people hidden in the rubble. The 45+k numbers include only people confirmed killed.