Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 433 posts

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#31

Post by wenbin »

In the near future, a significant portion of YouTube videos and podcasts will likely be AI-generated (e.g., through tools like Notebook LM).

However, I'm uncertain whether audiences will truly enjoy this AI-generated content. Personally, I prefer content created by humans—it feels more authentic and engaging to me.

It’s crucial for AI tools to include robust detection mechanisms, such as reliable watermarks, to help other platforms identify AI-generated content. Unfortunately, current detection tools for AI-generated audio are still lacking - https://www.npr.org/2024/04/05/1241446778/deepfake-audio-det...

[Edit] We just put together a list of notebooklm generated "podcasts": https://github.com/ListenNotes/notebooklm-generated-fake-pod...

Consider whether you'd enjoy listening to AI-generated podcasts. I believe people might be okay with shows they create themselves, but are less likely to appreciate 'podcasts' ai-generated by others.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#32

Post by claudiulodro »

ErikAugust wrote: post #14

Someone needs to invent a “for humans, by humans” web. Possibly a future luxury.

Hear me out: is that Wikipedia? I am sure people are submitting all sorts of AI-generated information, but it's probably getting rejected? (If someone better informed than me has any data one way or the other, I'm super curious)

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#34

Post by unsigner »

claudiulodro wrote: post #32
ErikAugust wrote: post #14

Someone needs to invent a “for humans, by humans” web. Possibly a future luxury.

Hear me out: is that Wikipedia? I am sure people are submitting all sorts of AI-generated information, but it's probably getting rejected? (If someone better informed than me has any data one way or the other, I'm super curious)

Quite contrary, people are gleefully machine translating Wikipedia to make more Wikipedia (in different languages). And arguing for it.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#38

Post by Havoc »

claudiulodro wrote: post #25

Google is going to have to solve for this somehow if they want to remain relevant, right? If searching for an image and generating the image yield the same result, what's the point of image search any more?

Their image search is presumably not profitable anyway so not sure they care

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#39

Post by devmor »

ErikAugust wrote: post #14

Someone needs to invent a “for humans, by humans” web. Possibly a future luxury.

LLMs are reinforced through adversarial training - you would essentially be playing a keep-up game with AI generated garbage that would get exponentially more difficult to pull ahead in.

Re: Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock" are AI generated

#40

Post by Havoc »

wenbin wrote: post #31

In the near future, a significant portion of YouTube videos and podcasts will likely be AI-generated (e.g., through tools like Notebook LM). However, I'm uncertain whether audiences will truly enjoy this AI-generated content. Personally, I prefer content created by humans—it feels more authentic and engaging to me. It’s crucial for AI tools to include robust detection mechanisms, such as reliable watermarks, to help…

Question is how long till you can’t tell the difference
Post reply on HN