Live data from Hacker News

Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

rijksmuseum.nl

31–40 of 153 posts

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#32
> an error of even 1/8 mm in the placement of the camera would result in a useless image.

That doesn’t make sense to me. Presumably part of the image stitching process is aligning the images to each other based on the areas they overlap, so why do they need that much precision in the camera placement? I’d think keeping the camera square to the painting would be important to minimize needing to skew the images, but that doesn’t seem to be what they’re talking about.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#33

I worked at this museum a few decades ago on a contract job, it was cool to walk around among so much history. Though I never really could appreciate the "old masters" from the Dutch Golden Age. Their work was part art and part record-keeping for which nowadays we have photography and video. The subject of many of these works are stuffy rich people posing for the "family album". Artfully done yes but boring subjects…

Sounds like you have been to the Rijks and nowhere else. Lots of old paintings of all kinds of scenes hang in lots of museums all over this country. Not a huge museum goer but this lacks nuance.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#34
post #32

> an error of even 1/8 mm in the placement of the camera would result in a useless image. That doesn’t make sense to me. Presumably part of the image stitching process is aligning the images to each other based on the areas they overlap, so why do they need that much precision in the camera placement? I’d think keeping the camera square to the painting would be important to minimize needing to skew the images, but th…

I assumed it was mostly distance from painting surface to camera that needed to be controlled for.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#35

Oh wow, that is so cool. I thought I was at max zoom, normal blurry tiles. Then BOOM! It came into focus and I saw tiny cracks, smallest areas of paint, no loss of clarity. It's like you're standing right up next to it. That's incredible! Wow, all I can say. That's insane, that is totally insane! I would love if there were a depthmask or something and a synthetic "keylight" feature you could drag around to really get…

Enhance, but actually :)

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#36

I worked at this museum a few decades ago on a contract job, it was cool to walk around among so much history. Though I never really could appreciate the "old masters" from the Dutch Golden Age. Their work was part art and part record-keeping for which nowadays we have photography and video. The subject of many of these works are stuffy rich people posing for the "family album". Artfully done yes but boring subjects…

I agree with you on the subjects are boring rich people, if we judge it with today standards. For the time it was actually quite unique that (upper) middle class people could get their portrait done, and not just nobles.

I like to think of it as part of a period of history where the merchants start to gain power from the aristocracy and that shows in what gets passed down to us.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#37
Shortly after the painting was completed it was cropped so that it would fit on the wall. See if you can guess which edge was the victim.

Of the high resolution image itself... I teach painting and regularly use such images as teaching aids. I honesty belive that they have as much teaching value (or even more) than seeing the real thing. The details of paint applicationare magnificently clear in such images.

Re: Ultra high-resolution image of The Night Watch (2022)

#40
Very vaguely related to image detail but you know what similarly impressed the heck out of me:

you know that first ever imaging of a black hole using telescopes across the globe and even the poles to make the signal gathering as wide as possible?

well that telescope (interferometer) could also image a TENNIS BALL on the MOON

(in perspective currently 5 meters is the best resolution of the moon we have and they only get like one or two photons back when they bounce a laser off that mirror the astronauts left there)

So are we going to enter an era where we can get ten more times out of existing telescopes with exponentially better sensors?

Post reply on HN