Live data from Hacker News

uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

old.reddit.com

31–40 of 134 posts

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Multi-profile support has been in FF since I started using it (at least 5 years ago?). The profile picker isn't as pretty as the Chrome window you get but its definitely there.

I've also been using it for years, and it seems to work exactly how it should, but it does seem to be a bit of a "hidden feature" in my opinion. It wasn't super easy to figure out that the feature existed and how to use it.

There’s also containers, which probably covers 90% of use cases for profiles: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

#33
My guess is that the user took the screenshot from a Chrome Beta/Dev/Canary build which is following an accelerated timeline for disabling Manifest V2 extensions [1].

Also, note that there is an enterprise policy that can enable Manifest V2 extensions through June 2025 [2].

[1]: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate...

[2]: https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/#ExtensionManifestV...

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

#34
post #16

Give me decent multi-profile support in firefox and I won't need a chromium browser anymore

Have you looked into Firefox Multi-Account Containers[1]?

It met all my needs for multiple profiles. I use it to have multiple concurrent sessions for different sites (eg: one AWS account/role per container).

[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account...

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

#35
post #2

It works better in Firefox anyway. Use Firefox and be happy: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...

I absolutely agree with that from a technical perspective, but in typical usage, the users won't notice any difference.

To be honest, I think uBo almost become a cult (which is nothing wrong, to be clear). It has lots of very opinionated development progress happened/happening to it, and most of them are irrelevant for majority of users (even the "power" users). And if I dare to say, it's at the cost of its UX.

For example, a few years ago, uBo disabled the ability to "greenlight" a domain (i.e. adding a whitelist dynamic rule) by simply clicking in the (advanced) popup. The official reason is that it's the most misused features, which is true, but it makes legitimate use of it (to whitelist a 3rd-party domain for a specific site because otherwise the site is broken) very inconvenient.

And if you ask about it, they (people in related forums like reddit) tell you "well you should never use it. NOOP should be sufficient. If not, the rules are wrong and you should report to the rule author(s)." This is cool but it didn't solve my immediate problem that a site I want to visit is broken by uBo.

I learned later, again from uBo subreddit, that you can double press ctrl to temporarily enable this feature back -- which is more than enough for me -- but how the hell do you even discover this?

And I never remembered what the two columns for adding dynamic rules are supposed to be -- since there is no headers.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

#36
uBlock Origin Lite is available here: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/...

It does the same basic content blocking with no permissions required. Then you can opt-in sites for it to do more blocking, including I believe opt-ing in all sites for what appears to be the same blocking as regular uBlock Origin.

Positive side: faster, fewer permissions by default, more control over permissions.

Negatives: less blocked by default, requires opt-in for more blocking.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

#37
post #16

Give me decent multi-profile support in firefox and I won't need a chromium browser anymore

Multi-profile support has been in FF since I started using it (at least 5 years ago?). The profile picker isn't as pretty as the Chrome window you get but its definitely there.

FF profiles do work.

The problem is discoverability and UX. I believe, in chrome profile management is another menu option. In FF you have to use about:profiles or start Firefox with a specific command line argument.

Unless you know about it or are actively looking for the feature, there's no way to know. If you are coming from Chrome, this unfortunately leaves the impression that Firefox doesn't support profiles (a must have feature for some).

It doesn't even hint or show up in settings search. It is as if they don't want anyone to use/know about profiles.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

#38
post #2

It works better in Firefox anyway. Use Firefox and be happy: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...

Firefox has a vested interest (money) now for people to watch (their network) ads. Expect to move Firefox to drop uBlock too (written in Firefox with uBlock)

Is this supposed to be an argument for Chrome? They had their chance and blew it.

If Mozilla proves unviable we’ll move from Firefox to the next entity that isn’t hostile to their user base or make one that isn’t.

Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on Chrome web store

#39

My guess is that the user took the screenshot from a Chrome Beta/Dev/Canary build which is following an accelerated timeline for disabling Manifest V2 extensions [1]. Also, note that there is an enterprise policy that can enable Manifest V2 extensions through June 2025 [2]. [1]: https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate... [2]: https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/#ExtensionManifestV...

Still, time to swap brower rather than prolonging it.
Post reply on HN