Live data from Hacker News

Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 112 posts

Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?

#31

bash and readline - Chet Ramey. Both originally by Brian Fox https://twobithistory.org/2019/08/22/readline.html maybe less of a bus factor now with OSH approaching feature/speed parity and having more maintainers https://www.oilshell.org/

For a moment I thought you meant open source hardware. Then came my disappointment.

Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?

#32
Note that the situation will not be much better for closed sourced projects.

Sure, your vendor will probably fix bugs, but it may take some time until they find someone who has any knowledge of that codebase and survived last week's reshuffle, the re-org in spring and last year's buyout.

Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?

#34
post #26
post #15

Php

I'm surprised to hear this, any more info?

Its wrong, or at least not my definition of few people.

https://thephp.foundation/structure/

"Core Developers The PHP Foundation contracts 10 full-time and part-time engineers to maintain and develop the PHP language."

Re: Which open-source projects are widely used but maintained by just a few people?

#36

In this thread: Wildly different definitions of what "widely used" means :) Did you know tools like uname [1] and cat [2] in GNU coreutils have essentially only had two contributors in the past decade? [1] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=histor... [2] http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=histor...

I'm actually surprised by the amount of changes in 'cat'. One would assume a program like that is already 'done'.
Post reply on HN