Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobson%27s_choice
what would be a fair alternative to the "undesirable" choice?
Docker-OSX image removed after Apple reports copyright infringement
31–35 of 35 posts
Re: Docker-OSX image removed after Apple reports copyright infringement
#32Re: Docker-OSX image removed after Apple reports copyright infringement
#33Re: Docker-OSX image removed after Apple reports copyright infringement
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
what would be a fair alternative to the "undesirable" choice?
I don't really see that there is one. I think Docker was pushed into taking this action and didn't have any other reasonable course of action.
Docker wasn't pushed into taking the image down, they *decided* that they'd rather take the image down than have a jury decide who is in the wrong.
Re: Docker-OSX image removed after Apple reports copyright infringement
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Buy a mac. It comes with the OS. Otherwise, talk to Apple but they probably don't do direct sales of their OS. That might be inconvenient for you but that doesn't change the legal situation that you need a license to distribute binaries that belong to them.
> the legal situation that you need a license to distribute binaries that belong to them Legally speaking, they don't own the binaries but just have a temporary monopoly.