Live data from Hacker News

Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

bbc.com

31–40 of 128 posts

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#31
Is it common in British English to use "for" instead of "by" when talking about the creator?

''' After inspecting it personally to test his theory, he confirmed the artwork was created *for* tapestry maker Ralph Sheldon and dated back to the 1590s.

It was one of a collection of 22 portraits made *for* Sheldon, but the whereabouts of only a handful were known.

'''

I'm confused whether Sheldon is the painter or the commissioner.

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#32
post #28

Huh. I share a surname with the original owner (Sheldon) and once researched Henry XIII for a people fair. I think that means I’m the rightful owner…

By British rules if you can smuggle it out of the country, it's legally yours. That's how they filled the British Museum.

British? Isn't that just a human rule until about 1946.

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#33
post #6

[flagged]

Twitter was renamed to X after being purchased by a new owner.

Apart from the platform name, I was thrown off by the word “after”. Should have been “from”. And I dont like the word “random”.

  *Missing portrait of Henry VIII randomly found on an X post*

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#34
post #10

I think "Missing" is a pretty poor choice of word for this; "Presumed lost to history" would better explain what's happened - Which is both incredible and terribly dull at the same time! Somebody connected the dots on the provenance of a quite old painting that was venerated, but perhaps not as much as it should have been, not far from it's last known location - At least in distance, if not time. Great detective work…

"Random" is also a pretty bad word for this. But hey, English is hard, and neither word usage impedes understanding of the article itself.

As in Random Access Memory? (I'm not sure of an application for memory that can only be accessed randomly).

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#35
post #31

Is it common in British English to use "for" instead of "by" when talking about the creator? ''' After inspecting it personally to test his theory, he confirmed the artwork was created * for* tapestry maker Ralph Sheldon and dated back to the 1590s. It was one of a collection of 22 portraits made * for* Sheldon, but the whereabouts of only a handful were known. ''' I'm confused whether Sheldon is the painter or the c…

I don't think Sheldon made these portraits? They were commissioned as mentioned in other comments.

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By British rules if you can smuggle it out of the country, it's legally yours. That's how they filled the British Museum.

British? Isn't that just a human rule until about 1946.

This Henry VIII portrait is under UK jurisdiction at the moment.

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#37
post #31

Is it common in British English to use "for" instead of "by" when talking about the creator? ''' After inspecting it personally to test his theory, he confirmed the artwork was created * for* tapestry maker Ralph Sheldon and dated back to the 1590s. It was one of a collection of 22 portraits made * for* Sheldon, but the whereabouts of only a handful were known. ''' I'm confused whether Sheldon is the painter or the c…

I don't think Sheldon made these portraits? They were commissioned as mentioned in other comments.

"The artist of the series remains unknown, although his distinct hand is recognised by the title of 'The Sheldon Master'."

Corroborated by the original blog post. Odd that the article isn't clear on this point.

https://historicalportraits.com/artworks/82-the-sheldon-mast...

https://adamfineart.wordpress.com/2024/07/04/ralph-sheldons-...

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#38
post #31

Is it common in British English to use "for" instead of "by" when talking about the creator? ''' After inspecting it personally to test his theory, he confirmed the artwork was created * for* tapestry maker Ralph Sheldon and dated back to the 1590s. It was one of a collection of 22 portraits made * for* Sheldon, but the whereabouts of only a handful were known. ''' I'm confused whether Sheldon is the painter or the c…

[deleted]

Re: Missing Henry VIII portrait found after random X post

#39
post #31

Is it common in British English to use "for" instead of "by" when talking about the creator? ''' After inspecting it personally to test his theory, he confirmed the artwork was created * for* tapestry maker Ralph Sheldon and dated back to the 1590s. It was one of a collection of 22 portraits made * for* Sheldon, but the whereabouts of only a handful were known. ''' I'm confused whether Sheldon is the painter or the c…

I don't think Sheldon made these portraits? They were commissioned as mentioned in other comments.

Got you. I was just confused as to why a guy would commission paintings of a king for his own use but I didn't live in that era so maybe it was in vogue.
Post reply on HN