Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can't you mathematically work out how to change the colors/opacity to rearrange the job?
Having that knowledge sounds just as expensive if the operations aren't commutative.
So you think you know box shadows?
31–40 of 130 posts
Re: So you think you know box shadows?
#32I'm embarrassed to admit it took until the final paragraph before realising that 'gypity' is a reference to Chat GPT.
Re: So you think you know box shadows?
#33Re: So you think you know box shadows?
#34He said it might melt your processor... but on a macbook m3 in arc runs great, like every one of those was amazing.
Re: So you think you know box shadows?
#35> It also turns out that some smart people figured out maths hacks to draw rounded boxes for super cheap which UI peeps love because with this hack boxes can be so round as to appear as circles Any references to learn more about these hacks?
A modern 3D accelerated article (using SDF as another commenter suspected) https://mortoray.com/quickly-drawing-a-rounded-rectangle-wit...
Re: So you think you know box shadows?
#36Re: So you think you know box shadows?
#37Re: So you think you know box shadows?
#38I'm totally down for some good old fashioned impractical hacking. But just remember, we already have canvas, which can do all this easier, faster, and better.
Re: So you think you know box shadows?
#39[flagged]
Come on. It's thanks to articles like these I can finally have LLM write all those bullshit CSS hacks for me, and I even get to keep rejecting its commits until it gets it right! (Though honestly, right now, getting GPT-4o to do responsive layout is an exercise in frustration equivalent to doing it myself.)