Live data from Hacker News

A search engine by and for the federal government

search.gov

31–40 of 67 posts

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe I'm dense but why would you expect a government service to not use common tooling available to them?

I think access to government services is an impoetant part of democracy. Because you have no alternative, they should be Held to higher Standards of privacy. Google doesn't need to know everything.

This is how you increase the cost of government services. Though it would be nice if over time the government developed their own alternatives.

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think access to government services is an impoetant part of democracy. Because you have no alternative, they should be Held to higher Standards of privacy. Google doesn't need to know everything.

This is how you increase the cost of government services. Though it would be nice if over time the government developed their own alternatives.

How would removing tag manager make this website more expensive to run?

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#33
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is how you increase the cost of government services. Though it would be nice if over time the government developed their own alternatives.

How would removing tag manager make this website more expensive to run?

It would be much more difficult to understand what users are doing with the products and prioritize development.

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#34
post #4

The new tech stuff the government has been putting out is legitimately fantastic. login.gov is probably my favorite sign-in experience, maybe slightly behind Google's (and considerably ahead of Apple or Microsoft's).

It's funny we expect governments stuff to be so bad that when they do something at the level of a regular SaaS our minds are blown.

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#36

A cool thing. In Germany this would not be possible. EVB-IT Cloud contracts, DSGVO and other legal stuff slow down everything and costs are exploding. No inhouse ressources available double the trouble

I have s feeling GDPR is often used as an excuse in these cases while there is little evidence that it's actually slowing anything down. Especially for government: they do have the data alread and the GDPR applies to the dat itself, not whether you put a fancy frontend on it or not.

Government departments tend to be slow to adopt - again, based on feeling more than hard evidence - especially emin Germany. They'll just try to find some scapegoat for why they're failing, and GDPR is perfect. I've seen the same in businesses as well, where I've seen told numerous times they're behind schedule because of GDPR or they can't do this because of GDPR and it's just not true most of the time. People just like to hide their incompetence

I don't know anything about EVB-IT, so I'll shut up about that part

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#37
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How would removing tag manager make this website more expensive to run?

It would be much more difficult to understand what users are doing with the products and prioritize development.

Can you give an example?

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think access to government services is an impoetant part of democracy. Because you have no alternative, they should be Held to higher Standards of privacy. Google doesn't need to know everything.

This is how you increase the cost of government services. Though it would be nice if over time the government developed their own alternatives.

[deleted]

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

SSA Already announced the switch to login.gov, it looks like it will have broad support if they are starting the migration there.

I don't suppose this implies the end of the social security number as a form of identity access authorization?

No, because the government didn’t use it as one, just private businesses.

Re: A search engine by and for the federal government

#40
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was absolutely flabbergasted that they didn't even white-label the third party stuff behind their own .gov domain, which means they're mis-training users towards "It's normal to hand over extremely sensitive official information to vaguely-plausible-looking companies with websites and certificates ultimately under the control of Montenegro."

And they'll accept anything from you without any ID whatsoever if you just use paper and a postage stamp.

What do you mean exactly?
Post reply on HN