The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
31–40 of 40 posts
Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
You realize there are such things as corporate policies, right?
I have a hard time imagining a situation where you'd need Sixel images in a corporate setting.
Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#33https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixel
So this is basically writing to the terminal as if it's a six pin dot matrix printer? Are Sixel images actually used very often these days? Is support in Windows Console a big deal, or just lots of fun?
Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#34https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixel
So this is basically writing to the terminal as if it's a six pin dot matrix printer? Are Sixel images actually used very often these days? Is support in Windows Console a big deal, or just lots of fun?
There aren't a lot of "legitimate" use cases for now, I believe, but it's neat, and IMO an image mode extension for tty kind of makes it whole.
Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a hard time imagining a situation where you'd need Sixel images in a corporate setting.
You’ve never run Gnuplot to examine some data? It is super convenient to run it and see the plot right there inline in your terminal.
Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#36Congrats to the Windows Terminal team member who went through the process of getting a PhD to implement this.
Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
conhost is in the terminal repo? Huh interesting, that surprises me.
Conhost and Terminal share quite a lot of code in fact. The text buffer, the renderer, the VT sequence parser - all that's the same codebase. That allows bugfixes and improvements to the the Terminal to also flow back to the vintage console (for people who still use that)
Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#38Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#39that's nice, but .. wouldn't it be better to implement kitty graphics directly at this time ? https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/graphics-protocol/
kitty is a product of a single open-source project, Sixel is a product of DEC with multiple independent implementations. DEC is out of business and there's very little risk of anyone coming out with a new version of VT333/VT340 reference manual, so Windows Terminal/conhost can have its own implementation of Sixel and ensure interoperability with other implementations as it sees fit, as opposed to committing to either…
Either way, I agree that kitty's protocol should become a versioned standard, but I also don't think that people will be very quick to change it at this point.
Re: The Windows Console gets support for Sixel images
#40https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixel
So this is basically writing to the terminal as if it's a six pin dot matrix printer? Are Sixel images actually used very often these days? Is support in Windows Console a big deal, or just lots of fun?
Yes, if that dot matrix printer could then also select any color you like. Sixels can do full color images.
> Are Sixel images actually used very often these days?
No, but support and use of them is increasing, not decreasing as one might expect.