31–40 of 134 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
A hammer can be used to hit nails or bash skulls. There are billions of hammers.
This is more like a magic wand in terms of its effectiveness . I think that’s the difference.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just run all key frames through stable diffusion and it should be quite good.
>Just Adding the word 'just' doesnt make it any easier. Something I've noticed is that people who have never done something themselves and are telling someone to do an difficult task, will use: "Just" in-front of it. This is particularly relevant in tech.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just run all key frames through stable diffusion and it should be quite good.
>Just Adding the word 'just' doesnt make it any easier. Something I've noticed is that people who have never done something themselves and are telling someone to do an difficult task, will use: "Just" in-front of it. This is particularly relevant in tech.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is a positive turn of events. Intellectual property as a concept needs to go.
It's a one-way street with AI companies though, they are against IP protection for training data but support IP protection for the product of that training. Read the TOS/license of nearly any big model and it's clear the creator considers it and its output to be their IP and they will fight to restrict how you can use it for commercial purposes or training competing models, because those being a free-for-all would ge…
But how ML is at least currently developing, other megacorporations and universities are only a year or so behind OpenAI etc, and publishing their weights and models. Of course disregarding training set IP because otherwise keeping up would be impossible.
If the media and advertising megacorporations manage to get a ban on training on IP material, Micr.. OpenAI would be a huge benefactor, as they could afford some weird licensing deal on everybody's data and the actual open efforts would be extinguished.
Luckily US hegemony is fading and many other powers DGAF anymore what a US judge says. Or a WTO judge, because USA kind of destroyed WTO themselves already.
I know it’s probably using < 1000x compute of the real Sora, but “pretty good” is stretching it
Just run all key frames through stable diffusion and it should be quite good.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI developers don't care about intellectual property.
Which is a positive turn of events. Intellectual property as a concept needs to go.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Just Adding the word 'just' doesnt make it any easier. Something I've noticed is that people who have never done something themselves and are telling someone to do an difficult task, will use: "Just" in-front of it. This is particularly relevant in tech.
It's very likely the comment you replied to said it in a joking sense
Earlier quoted context omitted.
AI developers don't care about intellectual property.
Which is a positive turn of events. Intellectual property as a concept needs to go.
Right now, AI is taking people's original works and rehashing them in a way that directly competes with the original work. Some AI firms (e.g. perplexity) just have their LLMs paraphrase the work lightly.
This is a problem because it drives original work out of business. Even setting aside matters of originality, artistic value, and AI being vapid slop:
Gen-AI is and will remain a derivative work that is reliant on original human-made work
ChatGPT is not going to do investigative journalism. If we let AI push all journalists into bankruptcy, the news just becomes an endless sewer of PR statements recycled into AI slop.
If you don't want Google's woke "diverse nazis" to push real news into bankruptcy, copyright is needed to stop them.