Someone told me that chefs use blue bandaids, because there is no blue food.
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/5dg5qs/til_t...
31–40 of 72 posts
Someone told me that chefs use blue bandaids, because there is no blue food.
https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/5dg5qs/til_t...
Just saw a Blue Jay last week. Chicory has nice blue flowers. Both are common in Chicagoland.
There are many birds which are blue, but none of them have blue pigments [1]. It's a light-scattering effect. [1] https://blog.education.nationalgeographic.org/2016/05/09/the...
The article mentions plants too. But I can list a number of blue plants in my vicinity (OK, sometimes a touch of purple too) or even in the garden: [Centaurea cyanus]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centaurea_cyanus?wprov=sfla1 ) [Digitalis]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digitalis?wprov=sfla1 ) [Centaurea]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centaurea?wprov=sfla1 ) [Scabiosa]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scabiosa?wprov=…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are many birds which are blue, but none of them have blue pigments [1]. It's a light-scattering effect. [1] https://blog.education.nationalgeographic.org/2016/05/09/the...
All color is a light scattering effect.. this article makes zero sense to me..
My favorite blue animal: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=Dendrobates+Tinctorius+Azureu...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Blue birds, blue jays, cerulean warblers, peacocks: all blue birds, but none of them are actually blue" I stand corrected
> none of them are actually blue The article is just trying to be controversial or something; they are actually blue. Structure colors are no less real than pigment colors. It's not an optical illusion or some glitch in human perception, bounce white light off a bluejay and pass it through a prism, a strong blue line will be apparent. That blue light really is there, therefore they really are blue. This notion that o…
I’m not a biologist, but these sentences immediately reminded me of reading articles about my company/technology after press briefings and feeling like they butchered a basic concept (or more correctly, I failed to explain it in an accessible way). Like, the sentences are grammatically correct but don’t make technical sense.
Plants are green(On earth) because they reflect the green color (which the sun spectrum is strongest) because they have probably adapted to better regulate different lightning condition during the day, for this they use two different pigments (chlorophyll a(blue), chlorophyll b(red); or other pairs)
The linked post— https://set.adelaide.edu.au/news/list/2019/08/20/why-is-the-... >—is much better about answering the question, rather than listing some examples. Basically: - Blue is rare in plants since it means leaving high energy behind. - Many animals are a color because of there food, and see above. - Thus, any blue is trickier, and usually done via scattering and mixing rather than a pigment. "The only excepti…
That is a bold claim, but a false one. A few butterfly species share that pigment. Mussels also have other blue pigments based in carothenes that don't depend on iridiscence.
>Organisms that appear blue must absorb very small amounts of energy, while reflecting high-energy blue light. Since penetrating the molecules that are capable of absorbing this energy is a complex process, the color blue is less common than other colors in the natural world. I’m not a biologist, but these sentences immediately reminded me of reading articles about my company/technology after press briefings and feel…