Live data from Hacker News

Raspberry Pi CM5 seen in the wild

twitter.com

31–39 of 39 posts

Re: Raspberry Pi CM5 seen in the wild

#31
post #3

I've been waiting for this, now, the question is, is this a drop-in replacement for the CM4? If so, these will sell really well (and will have shortages)

What's something you do with these compute modules (CM)?

Currently it runs my home assistant installation at home, so, a bit more processing would help, but it is not a critical load that requires speed most of the time. The most annoying task is compiling ESPHome firmwares from the raspaberry, which could take several minutes.

Re: Raspberry Pi CM5 seen in the wild

#32
post #25
post #24

What does this mean for someone non-technical who uses a Pi for home files server?

Nothing.

Okay, I'll bite: what's going on? Seriously. I know what a Raspberry Pi 5 is, I have one. No idea what I'm supposed to take away from a "CM5"

Re: Raspberry Pi CM5 seen in the wild

#33
post #30

I kinda don't understand the point of the CM5. If you want a SoM, you're generally building something "fancy" around it… and at that point anything involving Broadcom is just about the worst choice. I guess it gets some bump from the shared platform with the Pi, but… there's enough SoMs with good platform support at this point. And it's not like they're notably cheaper than those either? (ed. I guess they are still c…

> there's enough SoMs with good platform support at this point

You’re talking about the new (and expensive) Turing RK1 and the Nvidia Jetson as alternatives?

Re: Raspberry Pi CM5 seen in the wild

#34
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nothing.

Okay, I'll bite: what's going on? Seriously. I know what a Raspberry Pi 5 is, I have one. No idea what I'm supposed to take away from a "CM5"

CM5 is just shorthand for Compute Module 5. It's a raspberry pi 5 in a different form factor. Until it's released we can't know all the exact differences without apparently signing up for an NDA'd spec sheet. But see https://www.makeuseof.com/raspberry-pi-4-vs-raspberry-pi-com... for a breakdown of how the PI 4 and CM 4 differed.

Re: Raspberry Pi CM5 seen in the wild

#35
Went down the voice assistant rabbit-hole with Home Assistant. To integrate with an LLM, you will need a separate processor (or connect to the cloud service).

Wondering if CM5 will offer enough of a boost to allow on-device LLM processing on a Home Assistant Yellow.

Guessing the answer is no, but it might be worth trying.

Re: Raspberry Pi CM5 seen in the wild

#36
post #35

Went down the voice assistant rabbit-hole with Home Assistant. To integrate with an LLM, you will need a separate processor (or connect to the cloud service). Wondering if CM5 will offer enough of a boost to allow on-device LLM processing on a Home Assistant Yellow. Guessing the answer is no, but it might be worth trying.

Orange Pi.

Re: Raspberry Pi CM5 seen in the wild

#37
post #30

I kinda don't understand the point of the CM5. If you want a SoM, you're generally building something "fancy" around it… and at that point anything involving Broadcom is just about the worst choice. I guess it gets some bump from the shared platform with the Pi, but… there's enough SoMs with good platform support at this point. And it's not like they're notably cheaper than those either? (ed. I guess they are still c…

> there's enough SoMs with good platform support at this point You’re talking about the new (and expensive) Turing RK1 and the Nvidia Jetson as alternatives?

Turing RK1 and similar, nVidia not as much given their platform accessibility is barely better than Broadcom. RK1 is not particularly great either but significantly better than either Broadcom or nVidia.

I agree the really well supported platforms are both older as well as more expensive (e.g. i.MX & Sitara platforms.) However, I won't call the RK1 "expensive" considering it outperforms the Raspberry Pi (5) by a larger factor than it is pricier by (roughly.)

[Ed.:] Actually, no, the RK1 isn't better either, given there doesn't even seem to be a datasheet available for the module as a whole.

I guess I'm just living in my expensive but well-supported world of NXP, TI and ST SoMs that I can actually debug…

Post reply on HN