Live data from Hacker News

Leaked deck reveals how OpenAI is pitching publisher partnerships

adweek.com

31–40 of 296 posts

Re: Leaked deck reveals how OpenAI is pitching publisher partnerships

#31
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does presentation "deck" not come from when presentations were piles of slide cards? A "deck" of slide cards? Resembling a deck of cards? Do you also go into skateboard shops with this rant when they refer to their boards as decks? Edit: Actually I don't care, this is just normal (and wrong) Internet Pedantry™ but I'm just taken aback by how out of place and violent it is!

where do you buy your slide cards? they don't exist. its not a deck.

Do you also refuse to call music albums "albums"? The etymology is the exact same thing. Terms stick as formats change, that's the English language as it is used and it's not new or wrong.

Re: Leaked deck reveals how OpenAI is pitching publisher partnerships

#33
Is there any recent research on training LLMs that can trace the contribution of sources of training data to any given generated token? Meta-nodes that look at how much a certain training document, or set thereof, caused a node to be updated?

I fear that OpenAI is incentivized, financially and legally, not to delve too deeply into this kind of research. But IMO attribution, even if imperfect, is a key part of aligning AI with the interests of society at large.

Re: Leaked deck reveals how OpenAI is pitching publisher partnerships

#34
OpenAI gets the data it needs, and publishers get prominent placement in the product:

"PPP members will see their content receive its “richer brand expression” through a series of content display products: the branded hover link, the anchored link and the in-line treatment."

There's some similarity to the search business model

Re: Leaked deck reveals how OpenAI is pitching publisher partnerships

#36

Link to deck Please?

Risky due to steganography; the leaker might be compromised.

Blur, summarize, anonymize, convert to bitmap/PNG, release.

edit: i am aware it is literally impossible to release information without the remote chance of whistle-sniping.

the then only logical conclusion reached from such a defeatist extreme attitude threat model is to then assume that all stories and information are false flags distributed to find moles.

the decks themselves are surely water-marked in ways cleverer than even the smartest here. that doesn't innately negate the benefit of having some iota of the raw data versus the risk of the mole being wacked.

I didn't mean to infantilize the most powerful companies abilities; after all, they encoded the serial number of internal xbox's devkits into the 360 dashboard's passive background animation, which wasn't discovered until a decade later.

But the responses' tilt here are a lil....glowing.

Post reply on HN