Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
31–40 of 186 posts
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#32Nintendo is in an interesting position whereby they are actually selling emulators as a product to this day. Which gives them more of a leg to stand on in these sorts of efforts, regardless of whether or not I personally agree.
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#33Why are emulators illegal? I understand that they are associated with piracy because people play pirates games on them. But it’s like banning BitTorrent because it allows you to pirate, or Windows because you can play pirates games on it as well. The article mentions that emulators “illegally circumvent Nintendo’s technological protection measures and run illegal copies of Switch games.”. But which law makes it illeg…
DMCA section 1201
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#34I wonder if there’s a “git over BitTorrent”. Having a cryptographically signed (by authors, not by GitHub) and fully open source git hosting network would be a boom for FOSS security in general.
As much as it pains me to say this this might be a good use of blockchain
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#35Why are emulators illegal? I understand that they are associated with piracy because people play pirates games on them. But it’s like banning BitTorrent because it allows you to pirate, or Windows because you can play pirates games on it as well. The article mentions that emulators “illegally circumvent Nintendo’s technological protection measures and run illegal copies of Switch games.”. But which law makes it illeg…
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#36So are people going to make t-shirts with the cryptographic keys? I.E. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controvers...
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Usually the justification for emulation is "the company doesn't sell this product anymore, it's abandonware"
Emulation’s legal whether or not some of the software on a platform is abandonware (which doesn’t justify anything legally, anyway)
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#38I wonder if there’s a “git over BitTorrent”. Having a cryptographically signed (by authors, not by GitHub) and fully open source git hosting network would be a boom for FOSS security in general.
What’s stopping you from making torrents of your repos now? (Not as a rhetorical question; I don’t quite understand your vision, so I’m hoping you’ll clarify the usage.)
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#39Why are emulators illegal? I understand that they are associated with piracy because people play pirates games on them. But it’s like banning BitTorrent because it allows you to pirate, or Windows because you can play pirates games on it as well. The article mentions that emulators “illegally circumvent Nintendo’s technological protection measures and run illegal copies of Switch games.”. But which law makes it illeg…
Re: Nintendo blitzes GitHub with over 8k emulator-related DMCA takedowns
#40Why are emulators illegal? I understand that they are associated with piracy because people play pirates games on them. But it’s like banning BitTorrent because it allows you to pirate, or Windows because you can play pirates games on it as well. The article mentions that emulators “illegally circumvent Nintendo’s technological protection measures and run illegal copies of Switch games.”. But which law makes it illeg…
> But which law makes it illegal to circumvent such systems? DMCA section 1201
No person shall circumvent a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/1201
Can the emulators remove the circumvention code to avoid the DMCA takedown?