Earlier quoted context omitted.
>we continue to make 10s of millions a year while you miss your child's birthday Out of curiosity, are there many Googlers out there the have to miss their kids' birthday? Because from all the stories and anecdotes from Google employees, there's not much pressure at Google for overtime, quite the contrary, employees who want to work like crazy to "change the world" can do it, but most employees choose to go to Google…
In the story, he calls out a team working 120 hours a week, after first ramping to 100 hours/week for a while...in what seems like a example he's wanting people to follow.
Google wants employees to move faster
31–40 of 75 posts
Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#32> Raghavan clarified that the failure in image generation wasn’t due to a lack of effort. > “I want to be clear, this wasn’t some case of somebody slacking off and dropping the ball,” he said. So what is he saying then? Is he indicating they were sabotaged on purpose or that stuff just happened randomly - “an algorithm error”?
Makes perfect sense.
Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#33> "He said they’ve stepped up from working 100 hours a week to 120 hours to correct Google’s image recognition tool in a timely manner" Either Prabhakar Raghavan is abusing his employees or spewing bullshit. Given that working 120 hours in a week is working 17 hours a day, I'm calling bullshit. But even if it's not, the idea that a multi-billion company like Google wants their employees to "step up" and work 17 hour…
Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#34Meaningless executive speak. How should employees move faster exactly? Unless you are sharing exact guidelines, cutting down pointless projects and reducing work load, removing red tape etc. how do you expect everyone to magically ship quicker? If startups are beating you at your game with a tiny fraction of the employees, funding and resources, it should be obvious that the number of hours put into the job isn't the…
When asked when we were supposed to work on this innovation, he told us it was important to still work on our current projects, but do it more innovatively. When pressed about what this actually meant, he just showed us the graph again.
I resigned shortly after.
Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#35> Raghavan clarified that the failure in image generation wasn’t due to a lack of effort. > “I want to be clear, this wasn’t some case of somebody slacking off and dropping the ball,” he said. So what is he saying then? Is he indicating they were sabotaged on purpose or that stuff just happened randomly - “an algorithm error”?
Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#36Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#37> "He said they’ve stepped up from working 100 hours a week to 120 hours to correct Google’s image recognition tool in a timely manner" Either Prabhakar Raghavan is abusing his employees or spewing bullshit. Given that working 120 hours in a week is working 17 hours a day, I'm calling bullshit. But even if it's not, the idea that a multi-billion company like Google wants their employees to "step up" and work 17 hour…
Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#38> "He said they’ve stepped up from working 100 hours a week to 120 hours to correct Google’s image recognition tool in a timely manner" Either Prabhakar Raghavan is abusing his employees or spewing bullshit. Given that working 120 hours in a week is working 17 hours a day, I'm calling bullshit. But even if it's not, the idea that a multi-billion company like Google wants their employees to "step up" and work 17 hour…
Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#39I've never heard of a company that wants their employees to move slower.
Re: Google wants employees to move faster
#40Google have their serious problems, but they extend far further than just this guy.