Live data from Hacker News

Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

intel.com

31–40 of 260 posts

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#35

Can we expect the price of 'Gaudi 3 PCIe' to be reasonable enough to put in a workstation? That would be a game changer for local LLMs

Probably not. An 40GB Nvidia A100 is arguably reasonable for a workstation at $6000. Depending on your definition an 80GB A100 for $16000 is still reasonable. I don't see this being cheaper than an 80GB A100. Probably a good bit more expensive, seeing as it has more RAM, compares itself favorably to the H100, and has enough compelling features that it probably doesn't have to (strongly) compete on price.

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#37
post #25
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which would be impressive had it _actually_ worked for ML workloads.

Does it not work for them? Where can I learn why?

Just go have a look around Github issues in their ROCm repositories on Github. A few months back the top excuse re: AMD was that we're not supposed to use their "consumer" cards, however the datacenter stuff is kosher. Well, guess what, we have purchased their datacenter card, MI50, and it's similarly screwed. Too many bugs in the kernel, kernel crashes, hangs, and the ROCm code is buggy / incomplete. When it works, it works for a short period of time, and yes HBM memory is kind of nice, but the whole thing is not worth it. Some say MI210 and MI300 are better, but it's just wishful thinking as all the bugs are in the software, kernel driver, and firmware. I have spent too many hours troubleshooting entry-level datacenter-grade Instinct cards with no recourse from AMD whatsoever to pay 10+ thousands for MI210 a couple-year old underpowered hardware, and MI300 is just unavailable.

Not even from cloud providers which should be telling enough.

Re: Intel Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator

#38
post #7

> Twenty-four 200 gigabit (Gb) Ethernet ports are integrated into every Intel Gaudi 3 accelerator WHAT‽ It's basically got the equivalent of a 24-port, 200-gigabit switch built into it. How does that make sense? Can you imaging stringing 24 Cat 8 cables between servers in a single rack? Wait: How do you even decide where those cables go? Do you buy 24 Gaudi 3 accelerators and run cables directly between every single…

200gb is not going to be using CAT, it will be fiber (or direct attached copper cable as noted by dogma1138) with a QSFP interface

It will most likely use copper QSFP56 cables since these interfaces are either used in inter rack or adjacent rack direct attachments or to the nearest switch.

O.5-1.5/2m copper cables are easily available and cheap and 4-8m (and even longer) is also possible with copper but tends to be more expensive and harder to get by.

Even 800gb is possible with copper cables these days but you’ll end up spending just as much if not more on cabling as the rest of your kit…https://www.fibermall.com/sale-460634-800g-osfp-acc-3m-flt.h...

Post reply on HN