I bet we could do everything we want with tremendous simplicity and out of this world battery life... Probably would make a PinePhone feel like a Rolls Royce.
PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
31–40 of 141 posts
Re: PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
#32I remember investing in Palm thinking that they'd eventually be the ones to build something like the iphone. Sadly, they didn't and when apple did that was it for them.
They did have the Treo line! Arguably, what ultimately brought Palm down was their early success and the huge library of existing shareware and freeware tools: They desperately needed to try something new (Palm OS was just showing its age as a single-threaded, in-RAM, non-virtual-memory-based OS), but couldn't, since it would have alienated long-time fans by stranding their existing software libraries. They could nev…
Re: PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
#33What would it take to get this on modern (or even last generation) phone hardware? I bet we could do everything we want with tremendous simplicity and out of this world battery life... Probably would make a PinePhone feel like a Rolls Royce.
Re: PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
#34I was a Sprint customer from the start of the Palm phone era. Up until 2 years ago I was using colored Treo’s for my phone. I loved that mechanical keyboard it was so nice to use. ( I have slightly deformed fingers that make it hard for touch screens.). Merger with T-M killed the radio part. So sad to see it go.
They sure did.
Re: PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
#35This PumpkinOS project is pretty incredible. I can't imagine how much effort it would take to be compatible with all the system calls that the average Palm app would expect. I remember Palm did some truly weird things with memory: anything moderately large would need to be put into a special memory block that the OS could rearrange at will, and one would need to lock the block's handle to keep it stable while accessi…
Re: PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
> anything moderately large would need to be put into a special memory block that the OS could rearrange at will, and one would need to lock the block's handle to keep it stable while accessing it Didn't 16-bit Windows and classic Mac OS do something similar? If you're doing multitasking on a system without an MMU then I think that kind of live heap defragmentation would have been practically required.
Yes. The idea wasn't to get away with not having an MMU, though - it was to get away with shipping the Mac with an ungodly low amount of RAM for a machine with a GUI. I believe the original idea was to ship with like 64k or something? Obviously, with the state of mobile hardware back then relocatable blocks were also similarly necessary in order to save RAM. For anyone wondering, no, this isn't the thing that made cl…
https://retrocomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/10931/wha...
Re: PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
#37It should be illegal to show things which were an integral part of your life, a short 30'ish years ago, as if they were uncovered in the ruins of some pre-civilization. Not fair at all.
Re: PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
#38What would it take to get this on modern (or even last generation) phone hardware? I bet we could do everything we want with tremendous simplicity and out of this world battery life... Probably would make a PinePhone feel like a Rolls Royce.
Re: PumpkinOS, a Re-Implementation of PalmOS
#39Nothing made me feel older than going to the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, CA and seeing a Palm Pilot in the display case. It should be illegal to show things which were an integral part of your life, a short 30'ish years ago, as if they were uncovered in the ruins of some pre-civilization. Not fair at all.
I asked my boss to pay for it (he did) but he said: do you use anything to organize your life and projects right now? If you don't, I don't think a PalmPilot will help you.
He was so right.