Live data from Hacker News

Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

retrododo.com

31–40 of 65 posts

Re: Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

#31

Who are these guys? Oh they wrote a book for example, ok let's search for that topic: handheld history . 15 results of book stores (including the publisher they released on), reviews, other news sites, all covering their book, and then near bottom, their own page on the book. That doesn't seem off really, their product is still reachable. Whether they should be considered the authority, or the store selling it should…

The problem with modern search engines is discoverability. If you search for something by name, then sure you're likely to find it, but if you want to web surf and explore new content, then you're out of luck. My typical search results always turn up the same big sites: Wikipedia, YouTube, Twitter, Amazon, Reddit, etc. I rarely see new and novel websites promoted.

Re: Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

#32

This is really sad and upsetting to see. The real valuable content created by regular people is being obfuscated by useless AI white noise and nonsense content mill shit from giant corporations. Things just keep getting worse and worse for media.

Do you read retrododo? Their content isn't the gold-standard for retro emulation and most folks in the retro community are on discord or YouTube.

Re: Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

#33
(this is a response to a comment that has been deleted while i was writing it

i am not sure what the rules on this are, but i think the comment makes an important point that i believe should be discussed, so i am reposting it together with my response (without naming the author).

if this is not ok, then i'll get it removed. if the original author of the comment has a good reason to not have it posted, you may contact me by email (see profile))

the comment:

I think this is a feature, not a bug. The economic precariousness that the author describes is what makes the opinions of small outfits like his suspect. It's just too easy for companies to influence them with special treatment or outright payments. Reddit, for all of its faults, is hard to bribe. That is by design. We built mechanisms to intentionally cultivate diverse and redundant communities. Even if you try to control the mods of some particular subreddit, you are probably just shifting where the definitive/highly ranked conversations on a topic end up happening.

The author seems to decry Reddit as "not expert", but I think what its ascent has proven is the collective opinion of disinterested amateurs is often the best available.

my response:

that implies that every independent content producer is corrupt and only caters to the highest bidder.

how does reddit help here? each community is independent even on reddit. there are good and bad ones. a small community on reddit would be just as susceptible to manipulation as would a small community of the same size on an independent site.

and reddit is hard to bribe? well, maybe in specific cases, but reddit needs to cater to its advertisers just as well.

reddit, youtube and any other large site will only be able to represent the majority views because they can't cater to minorities that conflict with those views. advertisers won't have it.

an independent site can be completely onesided and be under the influence of some financial interest. or it can remain independent and actually represent the interests of its members in a way that reddit et al. can not.

Re: Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

#34
post #28

Using the free version of the checkbot browser extension to scan 100 pages from your site shows that your HTML is not valid (0% - all pages have an error) and CSS is 90% valid. Correcting this might change your search traffic.

Does Google de-rank pages with HTML/CSS errors? First I'm hearing of it, but it sounds interesting.

Re: Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

#35
I've been into retro gaming for a while (primarily consoles) and this is the first I've heard of this site. I've also not actively searched for "best ds games" or similar in the past 10 years as I just know to go to Racketboy [1] (which is currently down, so not a great look).

1. https://web.archive.org/web/20240320154449/https://www.racke...

Re: Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

#36
I see some comments here regarding Google or Meta market dominance, but the root issue is the open web's transition to controlled platforms. The rise of discord, twitch, or TikTok point to a continued trend and not a reversal. If I am a leader in content discovery or information aggregation, then I will have to work with the existing platforms like reddit to surface information. If Discord made itself discoverable, then search engines would instantly drive organic traffic to discord servers. But it is a closed platform. Forums fell in popularity for platforms with mobile apps that offer consistent interfaces, single user names, and easy-to-use community tools. The market is wide open for new content discoverability solutions but one would have to solve for the closed platforms dominating internet discourse today.

I cite Discord because it is text-first compared to Twitch. As an elder millennial, I find myself using Discord to interact with niche communities. For example, I care about a specific synthesizer emulation project. They have a discord server where we can discuss feature releases or music in general. Twenty years ago this community would be its own forum or a thread on a larger forum. https://dsp56300.wordpress.com

Lastly, if discoverability is monopolized by one player, then why and how did TikTok explode in the last five years? It is not the front page of the internet for all, but it is for certain age groups.

Re: Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

#37
post #28

Using the free version of the checkbot browser extension to scan 100 pages from your site shows that your HTML is not valid (0% - all pages have an error) and CSS is 90% valid. Correcting this might change your search traffic.

Does Google de-rank pages with HTML/CSS errors? First I'm hearing of it, but it sounds interesting.

I made the Checkbot SEO extension (https://www.checkbot.io/). Common HTML/CSS errors are fairly minor and aren't going to impact ranking, but are usually worth fixing to prevent potential problems.

Really serious HTML/CSS errors could get in the way of users and search bots from viewing and understanding a page though. For example, broken HTML might lead to broken links, broken heading tags, broken meta tags and broken images, which could have some impact on ranking.

So Checkbot isn't saying you can't rank well if you fail HTML validation (and it's very, very unlikely to be the issue in the article), but it's probably a good idea to fix it. It's really up to you to look at the errors found and decide if it's worth prioritising a fix, like you would with any other linting tool.

Re: Google Is Killing Retro Dodo and Other Independent Sites

#39
post #36

I see some comments here regarding Google or Meta market dominance, but the root issue is the open web's transition to controlled platforms. The rise of discord, twitch, or TikTok point to a continued trend and not a reversal. If I am a leader in content discovery or information aggregation, then I will have to work with the existing platforms like reddit to surface information. If Discord made itself discoverable, t…

Tiktok isn't for everyone. Its was Chinese app that catered for the Asian population, specifically China because of their tight surveillance.

It got lucky. It caught on because the content produced was tightly cherry picked to show the best of best. And from another country. The same would happen if a Japanese app was translated to English and had Japanese content.

However people saw this and jumped on the bandwagon. Younger audiences who were too young for Discord nor that type of person.

There's nothing special to it. It's just as manipulative as any other social app. Pushing all of that aside, still doesn't hook.

Discord's UX is so intense it leaves you dazzled which neglects the focus for older audiences.

They saw the niche of IRC and that it being a fossil pit. The established old-hat gamer Vent/Mumble/TeamSpeak user and the younger generation. Throw some edgy icons and make folk feel that they have power with a "server" of their own, apply "invites" to make you feel special your specially included in the same as every other guild and you have a platform for the younger.

Now with loot boxes, human psyche exploitation as any game company does; Blizzard and Overwatch for example.

Matrix/Signal are all too sterile. Telegram is a muck pit and forums cost money. Prone to rotting and require expertise. IRC is an idle fest most times of the day outside of community channels.

Join EFNet and join a random channel with users outside of LinuxHax0rs and it's a ghost town.

It's me that still feels left out. Im 35, Discord doesn't fit the bill. I don't game anymore so mumble / vent don't work out. IRC as above - and I know how it used to be, I was using IRC at 13. Very exciting seeing klines and network splits, bot wars. But still very nerdy and dull without creativity and imagination.

MSN Messenger/Y!M were my jam and there's been nothing like it since. Skype had it but sold out. Facebook is just a data hole and Instagram, eh, it has zero interest to me. I have no interest in seeing some family and their kids or someone posing in front of some statue.

And I can't even view YouTube without being forced to watch ads or forking out for a subscription for "premium", when theres nothing premium about that subscription.

And that sums up the state of the internet.

I just want a client where I can play silly games like a TokyBoom or a sketch pad where you can draw as a group. Voice chat without having to configure microphone settings nine times, leave a chatroom and rejoin without having to need an invite nor losing all chat. I'd pay for that.

/vent I guess so I'm here on HN hanging out as an unix engineer with developers and programmers which are just as edgy as each other. Because some cloud isn't as great as that cloud and PHP isn't Python and that we all should be using some new javascript framework weekly.

Reddit has gone to shit, digg is no more and Tumblr was too edgy for it's time. I think its time for real life. Oh wait.. I don't exactly fit in with the 40's folk who are out at dinners or clubbing. The younger crowds are all too kept in their clicks of university. Hobby groups are hobby groups and my generation where the hell are you!? With family and kids on Instagram...

Post reply on HN