Ibis is a large hotel chain. I am not sure using this name is a good idea.
Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
31–40 of 266 posts
Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#32Ibis is a large hotel chain. I am not sure using this name is a good idea.
Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#33If there's one thing I DON'T want a new version of, it's Wikipedia.
this could be an alternative to fandom.com
I also hear wiki.gg is pretty good, but they're focused on gaming wikis. A lot of Fandom wikis jumped ship to them (of course Fandom is like Hotel California, you can check out any time you like but your wiki content will never come down).
Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#34Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#35Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#36Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Their significance in public life was been almost completely replaced by Wikipedia, though
Wikipedia articles are not consumed like traditional encyclopedias anyway. I would say that encyclopedias became much less relevant in general, but being one of the first influencial online encyclopedias, Wikipedia came to be used as a volatile source of information even though it didn't strive to be one.
Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#38If there's one thing I DON'T want a new version of, it's Wikipedia.
Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#39Re: Ibis, a federated Wikipedia alternative
#40> The only solution is a distributed architecture, with many smaller websites connecting with each other and sharing information.
That is incorrect.
What you want is a block chain.