Live data from Hacker News

Reddit S1

sec.gov

31–40 of 58 posts

Re: Reddit S1

#31
post #4

Reddit DM I just got: "Participating in Reddit’s Initial Public Offering (IPO) from reddit sent 11 minutes ago Hello, TL;DR: – you’re invited to a special program that lets redditors purchase stock at the same price as institutional investors when we IPO. Details about eligibility and next steps follow. This (long, dense) message has all the info we can provide due to legal restrictions. As you may have heard, Reddit…

Got the same email. Wish I can use the offer (I'm not american)

Re: Reddit S1

#32
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you an active user? What was the cutoff threshold for this?

They discuss the Directed Shares Program on page 224. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1713445/000162828024... Briefly - Users & Moderators will be invited on 6 phased tiers. Accounts created on or before Jan 1st, 2024. T1 - Users identified by us who have made meaninful contribution to Reddit community programs. T2 - 200,000 Karma / 5,000 Mod actions T3 - 100,000 Karma / 2,500 Mod actions T4 - 50,000 Karma /…

Huh. That 100k karma might finally be worth something!

Re: Reddit S1

#33
I was expecting this to be thin but not that thin.

They list three pillars for financial. 1) Ads - which they've already done so priced in 2) Data - like the google deal they announced today with google for 60m. 3) User economy that includes "Commerce ecosystem" and brace yourself:

>Reddit Avatars as non-fungible tokens on the blockchain;

That really looks like an all-or-nothing bet on their dataset being valuable for AI and multiple recurring deals like google's resulting. It's certainly big & of reasonable quality, but at a minimum you'd need a way to neutralize the fact that most reddit interactions are antagonistic - users arguing & correcting each other...not necessarily traits you want a bot to learn

Re: Reddit S1

#34
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For a company that produced negative income, absolutely absurd. Why do investors put up with this? Is there truly no oversight? There is no way he provides value close to his compensation.

He is the co-founder, and he kept the company moving after a huge backlash against the previous CEO. He made some controversial (and bold) decisions like increasing the API price to block out third-party apps, but it seems to work? So yes, he somewhat deserves that compensation.

'bold' as in it was the obvious play after GPTs made reddit conversation archive an easy thing to profit off and protect

Re: Reddit S1

#35
post #33

I was expecting this to be thin but not that thin. They list three pillars for financial. 1) Ads - which they've already done so priced in 2) Data - like the google deal they announced today with google for 60m. 3) User economy that includes "Commerce ecosystem" and brace yourself: >Reddit Avatars as non-fungible tokens on the blockchain; That really looks like an all-or-nothing bet on their dataset being valuable fo…

Google really should not have paid reddit to train on reddits users data. This sets a dangerous precedent

Re: Reddit S1

#36
post #33

I was expecting this to be thin but not that thin. They list three pillars for financial. 1) Ads - which they've already done so priced in 2) Data - like the google deal they announced today with google for 60m. 3) User economy that includes "Commerce ecosystem" and brace yourself: >Reddit Avatars as non-fungible tokens on the blockchain; That really looks like an all-or-nothing bet on their dataset being valuable fo…

[deleted]

Re: Reddit S1

#37
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For a company that produced negative income, absolutely absurd. Why do investors put up with this? Is there truly no oversight? There is no way he provides value close to his compensation.

He is the co-founder, and he kept the company moving after a huge backlash against the previous CEO. He made some controversial (and bold) decisions like increasing the API price to block out third-party apps, but it seems to work? So yes, he somewhat deserves that compensation.

$193 million is absurd remuneration no matter how glorious Dear Leader is.

Re: Reddit S1

#38
post #20
post #19

Are there any Reddit alternatives these days? Something like HN but more slightly more casual (image/video embeds, subreddits)

4chan.org stacker.news

r/SomethingAwful is a private community

First Reddit makes it private. Then Reddit bans the moderator. Then the sub is banned because there's no moderator.

Re: Reddit S1

#39
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For a company that produced negative income, absolutely absurd. Why do investors put up with this? Is there truly no oversight? There is no way he provides value close to his compensation.

He is the co-founder, and he kept the company moving after a huge backlash against the previous CEO. He made some controversial (and bold) decisions like increasing the API price to block out third-party apps, but it seems to work? So yes, he somewhat deserves that compensation.

They could have paid me $10m, given everyone a $50k bonus for the crap, and been profitable.

CEO remuneration is out of control when somebody can perform such a beige list of acts and be treated like the Messiah. Mozilla is in the same boat. Such poor value for money.

Re: Reddit S1

#40
post #19

Are there any Reddit alternatives these days? Something like HN but more slightly more casual (image/video embeds, subreddits)

The default place for younger online communities is now overwhelmingly Discord. It's not a 1:1 replacement, but that's where the people are.
Post reply on HN