Live data from Hacker News

YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

youtube.com

31–40 of 90 posts

Re: YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

#31

I know this doesn't solve the issue but the browser plugin "unhook" is a nice quality of life improvement. I turn off homepage, autoplay, recommendations and have it take me strait to my subs when I type youtube.com.

I've put Firefox in recovery node (no extensions) and forgot it that way. Seeing YouTube without Unhook was an assault on the senses. I sometimes forget how bad the default web browsing experience is.

For others, Unhook lets you hide elements of the YouTube experience, and even replace your home page with just your subscriptions.

Re: YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

#32
post #5

Don't forget the obligatory "People also watched" section jammed into the middle of the search results which deliberately shows a screen full of things you didn't search for, that are at best tenuously related. Emphasis on at best because they're often not related at all. Who wants this?

I think it's funny how vague and redundant that label is. "People also watched this video". Yes, youtube.... it has a viewcount of 145k views, I would presume that viewcount comes from people watching it.

Re: YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

#33

So this doesn't even seem like an issue with search "quality" in a product sense -- it seems like something is actually deeply broken with YouTube search. This is a straight-up bug. For those not watching the video, he's searching for "games that think more gameplay mechanics equals more fun" (not in quotes) which you can see the results of: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=games+that+thin... He expects i…

[deleted]

Re: YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

#34
post #5

Don't forget the obligatory "People also watched" section jammed into the middle of the search results which deliberately shows a screen full of things you didn't search for, that are at best tenuously related. Emphasis on at best because they're often not related at all. Who wants this?

I think it's funny how vague and redundant that label is. "People also watched this video". Yes, youtube.... it has a viewcount of 145k views, I would presume that viewcount comes from people watching it.

[deleted]

Re: YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

#36
post #27

Has anyone tried to make a Yahoo! Directory vision of YouTube/web video? This isn’t going to get better on behalf of YT product teams, and Sora et al are going to ratchet up the stakes

Yeah, I was thinking along the same lines, something like a searchable db with links to youtube. But I discovered invidio.us which returns good search results, for now at least.

Re: YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

#37
Everytime I use youtube search now I'm getting disgusting, sexualized recs when I search for a specific topic that is completely unrelated to that crap. I cannot even block these recommendations from the search result list, I cannot block these channels.

Youtube/Google have simply become insane. You're at work, looking for some Youtube coding tutorial, and you get some video with a sexual thumbnail, or something about a disgusting ear disease or something. What the hell Google? Shouldn't these video be marked as sexual/NSFW content at first place?

Deleting youtube view history and turning it off used to fix these things, but not anymore, it doesn't make any difference. I've never seen that, a mainstream, non tabloid, website that forces its user to see sexualized or disgusting content.

Youtube employees here, do you really believe it makes people more likely to watch youtube videos? It doesnt.

I don't want to see "other viewers have also watched these", I don't want to see "for you". I only want to see what is relevant to the query I just made.

Isn't it ironic? Google beat Altavista back in the days because Google search results were more accurate than the competition. But now that Google is basically a monopoly in search, it simply decided to forego its core value for profit and display the user garbage results, results Google think the user might be interested in regardless of the search query, and not results the user explicitly searched for. This isn't a search engine anymore, this is a recommendation engine...

Re: YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

#38
post #22

The UX for google products has gotten so much worse. I've had problems with youtube search recently, but because I use google more often it's so much more obvious with google search. Like I hate how they have that bar that keeps changing different search modes, before 'images', 'videos' used to be in a fixed position, now I have to go searching for it in a soup of unrelated words like 'Finance', 'Flights', etc.

> The UX for google products has gotten so much worse.

In my experience the UX for google products has been an absolute dumpster fire for many years. I switched to DDG half a decade ago because I literally kept tapping/clicking on the wrong things constantly in the Google search interface. In other words it was so bad that I decided to switch even before the latest drop in the quality of search results, purely because of the UX.

Re: YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]

#39
post #5

Don't forget the obligatory "People also watched" section jammed into the middle of the search results which deliberately shows a screen full of things you didn't search for, that are at best tenuously related. Emphasis on at best because they're often not related at all. Who wants this?

> Who wants this?

Who wants the “Related articles” after the first paragraph in every single news article? Who wants the endless garbage links below the “Click to expand” button? Who wants to scroll past “Top picks in your neighbourhood”, “Offers near you”, “New on Deliveroo”, “Most favourited places”, “Meal deals”, “Top rated” and “Fastest delivery” (yes, ALL 7 of them) before you even get to the actual search results on Deliveroo? I really don’t know. And it terrifies me that I don’t know.

Post reply on HN