You seem to either not know the definition of the word "fair", or are simply engaging in bad faith. I'll presume cognitive limitations rather than malice for now.
In the context of this thread, this is a good summary of what is happening here:
> Apple's decision to alter the functionality of PWAs specifically in the EU could be interpreted as an attempt to navigate the regulatory landscape imposed by the DMA, but it may simply want to prevent users in Europe from using web apps with alternative browser engines. The company has not yet commented on its motivations.
Using PWA in a different browsing engine could be a viable way to bypass some limitations on the platform. Apple obviously doesn't want that, as it profits from those limitations.
Apple is abusing its power as the owner of the platform to both limit competition (everyone has to pay the rent for being in that platform) and limit user choice. It is inherently unfair.
If Microsoft did something similar on Windows, everyone would be up in arms about it, rightfully so. But when it is Apple there is a very tiresome parade of sycophants white-knighting for a manufacturer of luxury tech toys.
There's nothing else to be said on this matter. I'll not engage on this conversation any further. Feel free to have the last word.