Live data from Hacker News

Daft Social: Anti-social social network for minimalists

daftsocial.com

31–40 of 91 posts

Re: Daft Social: Anti-social social network for minimalists

#32
post #19
post #13

I'm sure they're not really overly concerned about security, but email addresses get logged everywhere on the Internet. Accounts would be pretty easy to hijack. Maybe that makes it more fun though.

I personally love low-security social networks. I consider HN to qualify (as you just need a username and password, no email verification). Small social networks can get away with it b/c they aren't big enough targets for abusers.

Your comment makes me wonder...what is HN's spam volume?

I never see any.

Re: Daft Social: Anti-social social network for minimalists

#34
post #13

I'm sure they're not really overly concerned about security, but email addresses get logged everywhere on the Internet. Accounts would be pretty easy to hijack. Maybe that makes it more fun though.

I don't think they take security any less seriously than most social networks. If you're worried the sending/receiving servers have access to the email address, then it seems you would have to be equally concerned account recovery via email considering most email is not encrypted.

Re: Daft Social: Anti-social social network for minimalists

#35
post #19
post #13

I'm sure they're not really overly concerned about security, but email addresses get logged everywhere on the Internet. Accounts would be pretty easy to hijack. Maybe that makes it more fun though.

I personally love low-security social networks. I consider HN to qualify (as you just need a username and password, no email verification). Small social networks can get away with it b/c they aren't big enough targets for abusers.

HN audience is much more likely to use complex passwords, that are not reused elsewhere.

So the overall security level is probably still higher than elsewhere with 2FA, etc.

Re: Daft Social: Anti-social social network for minimalists

#36
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't that just help with discovery? That doesn't seem like a bad practice here.

Discovering random threads to spam in doesn't help with discovery for users.

"daft", "discovery", "random"… I feel like I'm in a Daft Punk music thread.

Re: Daft Social: Anti-social social network for minimalists

#40
I came here to say that I think both Posterous and Tumblr used to have this same feature. Well, it was just one of the multiple ways of publishing content back then, as opposed to being the way for this minimalist one....

Looks like Tumblr removed it [1]

Links to some Posterous articles about the feature [2]

[1] https://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/16420/post-to-tu...

[2] https://www.guidingtech.com/1525/how-to-use-posterous-quickl...

What's old is new again.

Posterous was peak blogging and content sharing for me, btw.

Post reply on HN