[dead]
ChatGPT for Teams
31–40 of 453 posts
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#32Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#33don’t even get the option to force SSO unless you “contact sales” for the enterprise tier from what I can see :/
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#34Ok, so there are now 2 tiers where they don't use our data to train the model? The higher bandwidth is to clearly entice new customers, but the question remains, what happens to the old ChatGPT Plus users? Do their quotas get eaten up by these new teams?
Looks like the $20/month PLUS plan DOES use your data to train the model now... (they seem to have removed that "feature" from the list in the side-by-side comparison)
Currently, if you disable chat history, you'll see this message:
Chat History is off for this browser. When history is turned off, new chats on this browser won't appear in your history on any of your devices, be used to train our models, or stored for longer than 30 days. This setting does not sync across browsers or devices.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#35At the end of the day I wonder what openai's endgame is here. They're starting to expand their business in a way that geometrically grows the size of the team, overlapping products that microsoft is offering, making the whole non-profit/capped-profit thing a head scratcher. I guess you can argue this is just a marginal add-on to their existing ChatGPT product but I can imagine seeing them go full Salesforce/Oracle/en…
I kinda see it differently. There are these incredible use-cases for what they can do with this technology but still requires massive R&D and politics. They're taking the path of least resistance with these features. They should spin off R&D and let another division handle this low-hanging fruit garbage. But, maybe this is just how a business cycle works. You get a bite and you milk it for what it's worth and let the next generation organization take it to the next level.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#36At the end of the day I wonder what openai's endgame is here. They're starting to expand their business in a way that geometrically grows the size of the team, overlapping products that microsoft is offering, making the whole non-profit/capped-profit thing a head scratcher. I guess you can argue this is just a marginal add-on to their existing ChatGPT product but I can imagine seeing them go full Salesforce/Oracle/en…
> At the end of the day I wonder what openai's endgame is here
Sell AI products to fund making AI
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looks like the $20/month PLUS plan DOES use your data to train the model now... (they seem to have removed that "feature" from the list in the side-by-side comparison)
Currently, if you disable chat history, you'll see this message: Chat History is off for this browser. When history is turned off, new chats on this browser won't appear in your history on any of your devices, be used to train our models, or stored for longer than 30 days. This setting does not sync across browsers or devices.
It's absolutely insane to trust that they won't do this.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#38Pricing: $25 per user/month billed annually $30 per user/month billed monthly
Why would they make it more expensive than individual plans?
It’s marked up so they can offer a “special” discount on the sales call, and the customer can report back to their superiors that they “negotiated” a better deal and saved their company $X.
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#39A notable feature here is "no training on your business data or conversations" which really shouldn't have to be a feature. (requests using the ChatGPT API already aren't trained upon)
This is ChatGPT, not OpenAI's API with the gpt4 models. This is allowing your team to use chat.openai.com together, rather than having to build or deploy your own with the API.
Yes but even in ChatGPT the training is not done ?
Re: ChatGPT for Teams
#40A notable feature here is "no training on your business data or conversations" which really shouldn't have to be a feature. (requests using the ChatGPT API already aren't trained upon)
For some reason “Confidentiality Tax for Small Business” has less of a ring to it than “Teams”.