Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
31–40 of 215 posts
Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#32Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#33Am I missing something? It looks like this is incredibly unfinished.
> Catalyst v0.1.0 is a development preview with unstable dependencies.
So, yeah, it's still a work in progress.
Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#34As an infrastructure engineer who spends all day in Go and Bash and AWS I gotta say I’m a huge fan of Tailwind. This looks worth buying too. People are blown away by my front end skills, baby I’m just letting Copilot and Tailwind whisper sweet anodyne nothings into my ear. Keep me as far away from design as you can; this helps!
Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#35Slightly off topic, but has anyone read the license[0]? This point feels really odd to me: > Creating an admin panel tool (like Laravel Nova or ActiveAdmin) that is made available either for sale or for free. I mostly get the other restrictions. You can't buy the kit then repackage it and sell it. But why can't you make an admin panel? [0] https://tailwindui.com/license
Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#36Slightly off topic, but has anyone read the license[0]? This point feels really odd to me: > Creating an admin panel tool (like Laravel Nova or ActiveAdmin) that is made available either for sale or for free. I mostly get the other restrictions. You can't buy the kit then repackage it and sell it. But why can't you make an admin panel? [0] https://tailwindui.com/license
Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#37I bought tailwind UI more than a year ago. The lifetime/unlimited product or whatever it was. It’s generally fine but feels incomplete. Many of the components don’t have any alpine or JS code documented even though the team has clearly built those aspects when building the previews and demos. I’m not sure what the rationale was there but I hope they’ve fixed it here.
I’ve gotten into the habit of using “Inspect Source” in my browser when copying and pasting, because it tends to have almost fully-built Alpine transitions embedded. Kind of inconvenient and strange.
It’s weird that they don’t just provide the alpine code that they’ve already built.
You’ve done the work guys.
That’s my only complaint. It’s been good otherwise.
Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#38I bought tailwind UI more than a year ago. The lifetime/unlimited product or whatever it was. It’s generally fine but feels incomplete. Many of the components don’t have any alpine or JS code documented even though the team has clearly built those aspects when building the previews and demos. I’m not sure what the rationale was there but I hope they’ve fixed it here.
Even though the discord said they refund with no issues I haven't asked for a refund but tailwind ui was not worth the money unless react is being used. Such a massive disappointment there isn't any JS with the "vanilla" components.
Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#39Oh man, if this is more or less tailwind ui but already turned into thoughtful react components, I’m all in. Tailwind ui has been useful as a reference of a non-trivial implementation of tailwind css that you buy, which is great. Try to drop the examples into a real application and you’ll have a bad time, it just feels like something should exist already… and here it is! Hopefully, anyway, will definitely try it out!
Re: Catalyst – Tailwind CSS Application UI Kit
#40I bought tailwind UI more than a year ago. The lifetime/unlimited product or whatever it was. It’s generally fine but feels incomplete. Many of the components don’t have any alpine or JS code documented even though the team has clearly built those aspects when building the previews and demos. I’m not sure what the rationale was there but I hope they’ve fixed it here.
Even though the discord said they refund with no issues I haven't asked for a refund but tailwind ui was not worth the money unless react is being used. Such a massive disappointment there isn't any JS with the "vanilla" components.