Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX Loses Starship Spaceraft During Test Flight

bloomberg.com

31–40 of 193 posts

Re: SpaceX Loses Starship Spaceraft During Test Flight

#31
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't reentry supposed to be the hard part? How was this a success?

The largest rocket ever built just got to space for the first time. Even without re-entry this is a milestone. They have a production line to build these things. They’ll roll out the next one and try again. It’s not like SLS where everything is expected to work perfectly.

[dead]

Re: SpaceX Loses Starship Spaceraft During Test Flight

#32
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sad we didn't get any shot from the Starship onboard camera during reentry.

Starship didn't do re-entry though right? They lost signal, and what happened after that was not explained. It was at the target height and >24,000km/h when it lost signal. Some coverage suggested SECO happened, they they lost signal.

SECO = Second stage Engine CutOff.

Re: SpaceX Loses Starship Spaceraft During Test Flight

#34

"Loses" is kind of an incorrect way to talk about the launch. The flight made great progress and was just shy of orbital velocity (it was over 24,000 km/hr and orbital velocity is around 24,500 km/hr for a low orbit). Keep in mind that the goal of this launch wasn't to carry any payload. It was to get data and further iterative development. People here, especially, should understand how iterative development works.

I'm not really surprised at their choice of words, the mainstream narrative is that Elon is evil after all.

Even here, the detractors are coming out of the woodwork to complain about success. At least we get to mine salt from their tears, I guess?

Re: SpaceX Loses Starship Spaceraft During Test Flight

#35
post #15

The engines on the first stage did well in this test. During the first test they were malfunctioning like crazy.

Probably related to the tons of rocks and dirt thrown up during excavation of the surprise flame trench during the first test.

No evidence of this.

Re: SpaceX Loses Starship Spaceraft During Test Flight

#36

"Loses" is kind of an incorrect way to talk about the launch. The flight made great progress and was just shy of orbital velocity (it was over 24,000 km/hr and orbital velocity is around 24,500 km/hr for a low orbit). Keep in mind that the goal of this launch wasn't to carry any payload. It was to get data and further iterative development. People here, especially, should understand how iterative development works.

Loren is a bad reporter

Re: SpaceX Loses Starship Spaceraft During Test Flight

#37
post #29
post #11

What does this mean for the crewed mission to Mars next year?

[flagged]

Humans have willingly volunteered for this type of mission since the beginning of our species. It's part of who we are.

The people that will go, will fully understand there's no coming back.

Re: SpaceX Loses Starship Spaceraft During Test Flight

#39
post #24
post #2

Altogether, it was a terrific flight and a big step forward for the Starship program. The biggest success was the survival of stage zero, which bodes well for a quick turnaround for the next flight. Hot staging was the second big success, and Starship got to space. The flight termination was disappointing, but the actual functioning of the FTS system seems to be fixed. That was a problem with the first flight and sho…

The second big success was all 33 engines working reliably all the way up! There were so many nay-sayers saying if the soviets could build those amazing engines but couldn't solve their flameout problem on their N-1 rocket that Superheavy was never going to work

Looking at that full set of 33 engines burning almost brought a tear to my eye (and the controlled cutoff). That more than anything else tells me they've made it.
Post reply on HN