Live data from Hacker News

Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

foundation.gnome.org

31–40 of 53 posts

Re: Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

#31
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gonna be another Mozilla, it seems?

I know it is cool to hate on Mitchell Baker here. Lack of qualifications is not a valid criticism. She has a law degree from Berkley. Passed the California bar exam in '87. Was a high ranking lawyer in Netscape as their first legal hire. Designed the Mozilla Public License. Created the Mozilla Foundation. She has been in executive roles for 20-30 years.

How is this relevant, as far as I know Mozilla isn't a law firm

Re: Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

#33

Looking at the qualifications and past experience of this pick I am starting to wonder what exactly was the rationale behind this? The only work history listed in her resume is as a consultant, and as "Holly Million the Shaman Artist". This will be interesting to say the least.

From TFA: > Holly brings three decades of invaluable experience in nonprofit management, having served as a consultant, director of development, executive director, and board member for numerous organizations. Notably, she founded the nonprofit organization Artists United, dedicated to empowering individual artists and fostering collaboration across artistic disciplines for the collective good. Additionally, Holly se…

> Notably, she founded the nonprofit organization Artists United

Artists United (https://www.artists-united.org/) is not confidence-inspiring. A barely edited Squarespace template with a few pages with a few paragraphs on most, including some unremoved Squarespace boilerplate.

No contact information.

No information on who runs it. Just a "manifesto" and a "call to action".

Re: Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

#34

Looking at the qualifications and past experience of this pick I am starting to wonder what exactly was the rationale behind this? The only work history listed in her resume is as a consultant, and as "Holly Million the Shaman Artist". This will be interesting to say the least.

I was surprised that such high profile science education bio-engineering project like BioBricks was led by a shaman. Never heard of scientific shamanism before, maybe it is the development model of GNOME which would explain a lot of things.

Re: Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know it is cool to hate on Mitchell Baker here. Lack of qualifications is not a valid criticism. She has a law degree from Berkley. Passed the California bar exam in '87. Was a high ranking lawyer in Netscape as their first legal hire. Designed the Mozilla Public License. Created the Mozilla Foundation. She has been in executive roles for 20-30 years.

Yes. Mitchell Baker had every top job at Mozilla from 1999 to 2008. She was the Mozilla project's general manager, Mozilla Foundation's 1st president, and Mozilla Corporation's 1st CEO. She could be the wrong CEO for Mozilla now. But it couldn't be for inexperience.

Just goes to show hiring in house is no silver bullet

Re: Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

#37

Looking at the qualifications and past experience of this pick I am starting to wonder what exactly was the rationale behind this? The only work history listed in her resume is as a consultant, and as "Holly Million the Shaman Artist". This will be interesting to say the least.

Looks like her Shamanism business is a side gig. I see her listed as a VP on another non-profit website[0], so I guess she actually does have a track record of non-profit management. It don't think it's entirely unusual for people to have side gigs, especially when they're in management consultancy. I have a C-suite sister-in-law who is also a Reiki practitioner. [0]: https://dignitymoves.org/team/holly-million/

"has raised millions of dollars throughout her career"

Re: Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

#38

Why did they feel it necessary to have such a role? I mean Gnome is one of the oldest OSS projects, and has been functioning reasonably well in the past 20-some years without it (as a project at least, I mean. I don't want to go into DE-preferences). The post announcing the job opening doesn't make me smarter unfortunately.

This is not a new role, previous GNOME Foundation executive directors include Stormy Peters, Karen Sandler, and most recently Neil McGovern.

Re: Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

#39
Brian Lunduke has done some digging on her[0].

She’s a “professional shaman”, and herb “medicine” maker operating on Facebook and Instagram.

No software background at all.

If this is the kind of hires ESG & DEI brings, I think we can already conclude those two to be failed philosophies, and that all the critics have been proven right.

[0] https://lunduke.locals.com/upost/4740497/gnome-foundation-hi...

Re: Gnome Foundation Welcomes Holly Million as Executive Director

#40

Looking at the qualifications and past experience of this pick I am starting to wonder what exactly was the rationale behind this? The only work history listed in her resume is as a consultant, and as "Holly Million the Shaman Artist". This will be interesting to say the least.

Looks like her Shamanism business is a side gig. I see her listed as a VP on another non-profit website[0], so I guess she actually does have a track record of non-profit management. It don't think it's entirely unusual for people to have side gigs, especially when they're in management consultancy. I have a C-suite sister-in-law who is also a Reiki practitioner. [0]: https://dignitymoves.org/team/holly-million/

I would beg to differ. It seems to have been one of her primary activities which she has invested quite a bit into.

And which she is trying to remove from historical records as we speak.

https://lunduke.locals.com/upost/4740497/gnome-foundation-hi...

Who decided this seemingly unqualified person, of all unlikely people, was fit for the highest role in managing a multi-decade software project?

This is a shady hire. I wouldn’t be surprised to see personal connections turning out to be the sole factor behind her getting offered this job.

Post reply on HN