31–40 of 210 posts
Now imagine Spotify using this to generate individual earworms for everybody based on their personal tastes (likes, playlists). Yes, AI is partly hype, but had someone told me this even two years ago, I wouldn't have believed it.
Or I'd like to take a song I like, and make it educational, like make it include the period table of elements.
I keep thinking back to when we didn't have stabilityai and it was just google and meta teasing us with mouth watering papers but never letting us touch them. I'm so thankful stability exists.
Everything looks very convincing apart from the airpane pilot and the sound effects. They sound very weird as if one is hallucinating
Now imagine Spotify using this to generate individual earworms for everybody based on their personal tastes (likes, playlists). Yes, AI is partly hype, but had someone told me this even two years ago, I wouldn't have believed it.
Now imagine Spotify using this to generate individual earworms for everybody based on their personal tastes (likes, playlists). Yes, AI is partly hype, but had someone told me this even two years ago, I wouldn't have believed it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is why it’s vital that AI is openly available. Imagine a world where Spotify is the only company that can do that, and they use it to make sure they never pay royalties again.
How is Spotify for finding new music based on your tastes? I’ve only used Amazon and Pandora; Amazon is quite poor, Pandora is pretty good. I suspect (although, without proof) that if a service can’t suggest new music, it will have trouble generating new music as well. Anyway, I very much would rather run this sort of thing locally. You could just manually set your taste profile. Plus, music can be quite personal, im…
Singing would an interesting experiment, but I don't see that here.
Now imagine Spotify using this to generate individual earworms for everybody based on their personal tastes (likes, playlists). Yes, AI is partly hype, but had someone told me this even two years ago, I wouldn't have believed it.
Machine-generated music might be functionally equivalent to human-generated music, but that ignores the cultural role of art as a shared human experience - witness the liturgy of live music. That can't happen with music tailored to each listener, it can't happen without tracks that are fixed in time and can be referred to. I can imagine it well-accepted for dynamic music such as gaming soundtracks, but I suppose that…
Now imagine Spotify using this to generate individual earworms for everybody based on their personal tastes (likes, playlists). Yes, AI is partly hype, but had someone told me this even two years ago, I wouldn't have believed it.
Machine-generated music might be functionally equivalent to human-generated music, but that ignores the cultural role of art as a shared human experience - witness the liturgy of live music. That can't happen with music tailored to each listener, it can't happen without tracks that are fixed in time and can be referred to. I can imagine it well-accepted for dynamic music such as gaming soundtracks, but I suppose that…
These days I also feel like my workout playlists might as well be randomly generated dance music.