Live data from Hacker News

VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

blog.aawadia.dev

31–40 of 63 posts

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#31

Why not ovh's option called kimsufi or not Hetzner?

Hetzner was likely excluded because they have a habit of preventing signups, randomly banning accounts, or blackholing traffic exactly when your app is taking off because their shitty tech thinks your system was compromised or under a DDOS attack.

Is this anecdotal or based on widespread publicly available evidence? Not meant as an accusation, but it’s the first time I’m hearing this and it’s slightly alarming

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hetzner was likely excluded because they have a habit of preventing signups, randomly banning accounts, or blackholing traffic exactly when your app is taking off because their shitty tech thinks your system was compromised or under a DDOS attack.

Is this anecdotal or based on widespread publicly available evidence? Not meant as an accusation, but it’s the first time I’m hearing this and it’s slightly alarming

I run bursty workloads on Hetzner, never had an issue.

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#33
post #29

> Linode had the slowest cpus at just under 2Ghz Uhh, a statement like this somewhat hurts the ability to trust the other claims of the benchmark. Sure, Linode has the lowest clock speed, but you're comparing Epyc Milan which is almost a decade newer than the Sandy-Bridge EP of Cloudfanatic for example. Unsurprisingly, this is even reflected in the one cpu benchmark run, geekbench, which Linode comes first in.

> Uhh, a statement like this somewhat hurts the ability to trust the other claims of the benchmark.

Why?

> Sure, Linode has the lowest clock speed, but you're comparing Epyc Milan which is almost a decade newer than the Sandy-Bridge EP of Cloudfanatic for example.

Sure, but also take into consideration that the Linode instance costs $48/month while the Cloudfanatic one costs $18/month. Both of them have the same amount of CPU cores too.

Seems like this is a Linode problem of offering old hardware, instead of a problem with the benchmark itself.

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#34
post #14

Are they all just AWS resellers?

It’s actually the opposite. AWS will run on top of other hosting providers for some services and regions. That’s why you’re paying so much for AWS.

Could you elaborate further on what you're saying about running on top of other providers?

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hetzner was likely excluded because they have a habit of preventing signups, randomly banning accounts, or blackholing traffic exactly when your app is taking off because their shitty tech thinks your system was compromised or under a DDOS attack.

Is this anecdotal or based on widespread publicly available evidence? Not meant as an accusation, but it’s the first time I’m hearing this and it’s slightly alarming

Tbh, many comments here are FUD and downvotes by big tech employees. And somehow DO is HN’s little baby or something. They did have great ads during their launch period.

Hertzner is pretty great

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hetzner was likely excluded because they have a habit of preventing signups, randomly banning accounts, or blackholing traffic exactly when your app is taking off because their shitty tech thinks your system was compromised or under a DDOS attack.

Is this anecdotal or based on widespread publicly available evidence? Not meant as an accusation, but it’s the first time I’m hearing this and it’s slightly alarming

First-hand personal experience and then uncovering the thousands of similar complaints across reddit and review sites.

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this anecdotal or based on widespread publicly available evidence? Not meant as an accusation, but it’s the first time I’m hearing this and it’s slightly alarming

Tbh, many comments here are FUD and downvotes by big tech employees. And somehow DO is HN’s little baby or something. They did have great ads during their launch period. Hertzner is pretty great

Why in the world do you think “big tech” would single out one shitty German hosting company not even covered by the post in question, and I can't just be one pissed off ex-customer warning others to stay far away?

Hetzner is pretty terrible.

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#39
post #29

> Linode had the slowest cpus at just under 2Ghz Uhh, a statement like this somewhat hurts the ability to trust the other claims of the benchmark. Sure, Linode has the lowest clock speed, but you're comparing Epyc Milan which is almost a decade newer than the Sandy-Bridge EP of Cloudfanatic for example. Unsurprisingly, this is even reflected in the one cpu benchmark run, geekbench, which Linode comes first in.

> Uhh, a statement like this somewhat hurts the ability to trust the other claims of the benchmark. Why? > Sure, Linode has the lowest clock speed, but you're comparing Epyc Milan which is almost a decade newer than the Sandy-Bridge EP of Cloudfanatic for example. Sure, but also take into consideration that the Linode instance costs $48/month while the Cloudfanatic one costs $18/month. Both of them have the same amou…

You need to re read op.

Re: VPS Benchmarking – Cloudfanatic, DigitalOcean, Linode, Vultr

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tbh, many comments here are FUD and downvotes by big tech employees. And somehow DO is HN’s little baby or something. They did have great ads during their launch period. Hertzner is pretty great

Why in the world do you think “big tech” would single out one shitty German hosting company not even covered by the post in question, and I can't just be one pissed off ex-customer warning others to stay far away? Hetzner is pretty terrible.

What exactly happened? I m curious because I and my customers have been using it for years now without a hitch
Post reply on HN