Earlier quoted context omitted.
Has ElementaryOS gotten their staff problems fixed yet? I’m also annoyed that they don’t go for Objective C which could make a lot of seasoned Apple developers comfortable, but instead went for a custom language.
> custom language Vala wasn't a custom language for elementaryOS, it already existed for years before the first version of the OS (and i think the first version didn't use any Vala code). It most likely used instead of Objective-C because its object system was built on top of glib's gobject system and elementaryOS used Gtk and a lot of other glib/gobject-based libraries. Using Objective-C would mean they'd have to ba…
HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
31–40 of 150 posts
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#32I wonder if, in the future, stable diffusion or other AI techniques can be used to generate nice icon sets and other UI elements. Not that I'd expect Apple levels of design, but anything to bridge the gap would be nice...I'm primarily a macOS user, secondarily a windows user, and my forays into *nix have always provided a poor first impression. Anecdotal, of course...
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#33I'm not a lawyer but if this gets any traction Apple's gonna get big mad about the branding, aren't they? They're basically swiping original Mac advertising campaign wholesale.
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#34Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#35Contribute to GNUStep if you want to support a legitimate transition for Mac users. Not yet another aqua rip off distro running reskinned Mate. Just get FreeBSD with gnome or mate if you’re so inclined. If you’re using Hello as your daily driver, you’re gonna get your hands dirty getting things to work anyway. Might as well start from core. GhostBSD, MidnightBSD, TrueOS, haven’t people realized FreeBSD is too obscure…
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#36> Not a clone of anything, but something with which the long-time Mac user should feel instantly comfortable. The longer I look at the screenshot, the cheekier this advertising seems.
The screenshot makes me think they might have.
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#37I wonder if, in the future, stable diffusion or other AI techniques can be used to generate nice icon sets and other UI elements. Not that I'd expect Apple levels of design, but anything to bridge the gap would be nice...I'm primarily a macOS user, secondarily a windows user, and my forays into *nix have always provided a poor first impression. Anecdotal, of course...
Focusing too much on style can be a bit of a problem, though. All too often, Linux theming and UX feels very "skin deep" - and obviously, It'd be great if most people focused on stability and robustness at this point.
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
The complaints in the first post there really stood out when I looked at the screenshots on the HelloSystem site. I’m not saying what the complaints are, because I’m curious if they’ll be so obvious to somebody who isn’t primed to look for them. Could someone skip that thread and look directly at the HelloSystem site, then check and see if they also saw the issues in that post? It could be an interesting experiment.
What’s the moratorium for posting a comment here? 20 minutes from now?
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#39i don't know why people wan't to keep cloning osx, it might looks nice, but time has proven its a quite unproductive gui
Re: HelloSystem: A graphical OS built on FreeBSD
#40I wonder if, in the future, stable diffusion or other AI techniques can be used to generate nice icon sets and other UI elements. Not that I'd expect Apple levels of design, but anything to bridge the gap would be nice...I'm primarily a macOS user, secondarily a windows user, and my forays into *nix have always provided a poor first impression. Anecdotal, of course...
At most would take me a week or so to do I think, more likely less than a day.