No severance payouts. No bumps to your unemployment insurance payments. Everything is working to plan.
Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
31–40 of 212 posts
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#32Of course it's too early to tell with lots of confounding variables, but labor productivity has been taking a steep dive[0]. So perhaps in the aggregate, WFH is resulting in less work being done. I say this as someone who's been full-time WFH for over a decade; I'm not taking a position one way or another. [0]: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MPU4910063
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#33> “staggering 76% of employees stand ready to jump ship if their companies decide to pull the plug on flexible work schedules” People always say this, but I’d bet that the vast majority of those 76% would begrudgingly go in if it was demanded. Talk is cheap, as they say.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#34It is unclear who wants RTO, at least within tech and other leaders whom I know within tech.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#35Of course it's too early to tell with lots of confounding variables, but labor productivity has been taking a steep dive[0]. So perhaps in the aggregate, WFH is resulting in less work being done. I say this as someone who's been full-time WFH for over a decade; I'm not taking a position one way or another. [0]: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MPU4910063
It goes down because you now have to pay him more for the same amount of work. But it also goes up because marginal utility of his work has increased.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#36It is unclear who wants RTO, at least within tech and other leaders whom I know within tech.
Those who are entering the workforce, remote working is fun for greybeards and terrible for fresh grads, interns and apprentices.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#37the author of this article is a PhD who is advertising their services at the end -- it is partially a self-promotion piece. However it has quantitative survey data, and speaks to the regulatory and also practical concerns that real corporate management faces in managing a mid-size work force. Unlike other recent articles, there is little reference to the real-estate value of office property. Instead this article talk…
That's an author bio. Completely ordinary for articles and has been since the print days.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#38It is unclear who wants RTO, at least within tech and other leaders whom I know within tech.
Those who are entering the workforce, remote working is fun for greybeards and terrible for fresh grads, interns and apprentices.
So completely do away with tech hubs. People can continue to grow organically, they are free to stay or move as makes sense to them individually.
As a society, we should be striving to continue decoupling work from our identity.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#39It is unclear who wants RTO, at least within tech and other leaders whom I know within tech.
Those who are entering the workforce, remote working is fun for greybeards and terrible for fresh grads, interns and apprentices.
Re: Damaging results of mandated return to the office: it’s worse than we thought
#40Seems more nuanced than this discussion is making it out. We have had attrition and recruiting challenges with RTO, but also noticeable improvements in morale and productivity - especially when it comes to onboarding new folks.
I am sure you will need it with all the attrition. ;-)