No one spends this much effort trying to get their name associated with a discovery that they know is a fraud.
“We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
31–40 of 71 posts
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#32All of this is just noise. The experiment has to be reproduced and measured by others. Then we will know.
People wrote 3 days ago that i will take a day for it to be reproduced. Where are the results?
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#33Whether or not it's truly what they claim it is, it does seem the scientists believe what they are claiming. No one spends this much effort trying to get their name associated with a discovery that they know is a fraud.
Maybe they just have discovered an material with interesting electric properties rather than a super conductor. Time will tell.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#34exclusive property over ideas is an old practice that needs to stay back in the 20th century, where it was useful and when the technology was not just here yet
can we have a 21st century digital renaissance yet?
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#35I can't believe that the most important discovery of my lifetime is surrounded by this cloud of uncertainty. At the same time, having watched Oppenheimer recently, when humanity discovered how to split the atom was chaotic too and met with a lot of scepticism. I guess that's how we work as humans.
[flagged]
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#36I can't believe that the most important discovery of my lifetime is surrounded by this cloud of uncertainty. At the same time, having watched Oppenheimer recently, when humanity discovered how to split the atom was chaotic too and met with a lot of scepticism. I guess that's how we work as humans.
The 1989 cold fusion situation was already mentioned so I point towards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz%E2%80%93Newton_calculu... instead.
Even the brightest scientists have egos (maybe even more than the average person) and the prospect of fame and money has clouded the mind of many persons before.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, I guess. I'm not at all surprised there's this much drama around this. It sounds like it's a matter of a little time and we'll know what's going on. > Einstein's Relativity was called "fake Jew science". Thankfully, along the way, we discovered that "Jew Science" is quite good. I imagine an alien civilization visiting the Earth at that time trying to make sense of…
If you follow that rabbit hole you find that the Nazis had this whole batshit crazy alternative science. It was sort of like Lysenkoism in spirit (an ideologically conforming “alternative truth”) but zanier and wilder. Think hollow Earth and mystical traits of the Aryan race and such. I heard a historian once describe the SS as “what you would get if you made the Church of Scientology a branch of the military.” The N…
Not even close. In the XX century Mao leads generously, followed by Stalin and Hitler is the distant 3rd.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#38Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
People wrote 3 days ago that i will take a day for it to be reproduced. Where are the results?
It's in progress https://nitter.net/skdh/status/1684917544103116800 There will be a live stream once the material is ready apparently. Related Twitter space recording available https://twitter.com/andrewmccalip/status/1685465431317114880 (That's the only one I'm aware of. There may be more)
Twitter is members-only, a private site. Better to post the primary, public, source.
Re: “We are not cheating” (YH Kwon superconductor comments)
#40Whether or not it's truly what they claim it is, it does seem the scientists believe what they are claiming. No one spends this much effort trying to get their name associated with a discovery that they know is a fraud.