Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t think so because the critique is not of the font. Something like Times Newer Roman[0] might fall into that category? (Fair use is notoriously misunderstood, and I am no exception.) [0]: https://timesnewerroman.com/
Is that really legal? Seems that they are using Time News Roman's glyphs.
RealAboutInstagram – a replica highlighting harmful strategies
31–34 of 34 posts
Re: RealAboutInstagram – a replica highlighting harmful strategies
#32It looks like you're using a demo font, so it's missing some characters and is probably in violating of its license. Karla is a free font that's somewhat similar to the design of Meta's corporate font: https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Karla
Might this use be protected and allowed since this is a parody?
Re: RealAboutInstagram – a replica highlighting harmful strategies
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
For one, artists and photographers use Instagram to promote their work. The viral nature of social media makes it a lot easier for posts to get traction compared to, say, having to go through making your own portfolio site and then having to do website SEO etc. Maybe this doesn't bother the more technically minded, but as an artist you just want to get eyeballs on your art and any hurdle between you and that is takin…
The use case for photographers seems like a side effect of Instagram's popularity, not the problem they wake up every day trying to solve.
The popularity of instagram helps with the number of eyeballs.
Re: RealAboutInstagram – a replica highlighting harmful strategies
#34Easy to criticize, much more difficult to provide solutions