Live data from Hacker News

I'm moving my projects off GitHub

ntietz.com

31–40 of 124 posts

Re: I'm moving my projects off GitHub

#31

> As a GitHub user, I was always seeking green squares to try to make sure I had activity every day. I have never paid any attention to that at all. It surprises me that some do. Do you think it's common?

I had an interview where I had linked my SO and my GitHub. The latter just because it wasn’t completely empty.

He cheekily complained that I didn’t have much activity.

Re: I'm moving my projects off GitHub

#32

> As a GitHub user, I was always seeking green squares to try to make sure I had activity every day. I have never paid any attention to that at all. It surprises me that some do. Do you think it's common?

Others are saying they experience this, but couldn’t that be solved by using one of the many projects that completely spoof the history?

I mean there are folks with histories which would make you greeen with envy, but you can have the same history with ~0 effort, making it immaterial.

Re: I'm moving my projects off GitHub

#33
post #25

Sourcehut may have advantages but I just can't get past the design. I need some fun in my products and this feels like an abandoned village. This is a bad reason to not use it I admit

I can’t get over the PR handling with git send-email. I know, it’s “how git is supposed to be used” or whatever, but it makes it just worse. I can’t decide if it’s worse or better than gerrit though. Every time I need to use gerrit for some google stuff, I want to punch my screen.

There are even a few regular contributors on the Git project who complain about the workflow being `git send-email`/email centered.

Re: I'm moving my projects off GitHub

#34

Sourcehut may have advantages but I just can't get past the design. I need some fun in my products and this feels like an abandoned village. This is a bad reason to not use it I admit

The design is one of my favorite things about sourcehut. It's clean, to the point, and doesn't get in the way. (Of course, taste is subjective, so this is just me offering a different view, not saying you're "wrong".)

Re: I'm moving my projects off GitHub

#35
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same. In fact, I discovered git-backdate [1] which can specifically be used to hide the fact that your working hours are a bit deranged. [1] https://github.com/rixx/git-backdate

Either you discovered it within the 10~ish days it exists or someone is fudging the timeline...

It was 5 days ago

Re: I'm moving my projects off GitHub

#38

> As a GitHub user, I was always seeking green squares to try to make sure I had activity every day. This led me to change my workflow to generate more green squares, not for whatever is maximally effective. Having visible stars and followers also turns it into a sort of popularity contest. There's a dopamine hit when you get one of those, so it creates a strong reward function for attention-seeking behavior. > Anoth…

For OSS, Codeberg is also an option. It's based on Forgejo (a fork of Gitea) so it's much more traditional a forge in terms of contribution models than Sourcehut's email first model which can be off-putting for many.

Re: I'm moving my projects off GitHub

#39

> As a GitHub user, I was always seeking green squares to try to make sure I had activity every day. I have never paid any attention to that at all. It surprises me that some do. Do you think it's common?

Others are saying they experience this, but couldn’t that be solved by using one of the many projects that completely spoof the history? I mean there are folks with histories which would make you greeen with envy , but you can have the same history with ~0 effort, making it immaterial.

I used one of those in the past and it was a great subject of interest in my interviews.

They thought I hacked Github or something. Good time :)

Post reply on HN