It has an IR blaster. Why is this the only phone I've seen in ages with an IR blaster? And the rest of its specs look decent, although the battery is a little poor and the lack of USB OTG is a bit unfortunate. Still, if it had decent 3rd-party ROM support I'd actually consider it.
Finally someone mentions software support. Android 12 is good now, but what about in a couple years?
Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
31–40 of 67 posts
Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#32The Jelly Star is interesting too, another 3" phone with Android 13 and better specs than the 2e: https://www.unihertz.com/products/jelly-star
Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#33I have a Titan Pocket and just love it. Unihertz has also been a fantastic company to interact with: I broke my titan, walked into the ocean, and they replaced it for a small fraction of the purchase cost. I only wish the camera was better. That said, I think this Jelly looks like a good phone for my kids.
Do they have a waterproof version?
Whatever apps that don't work with the screen dimensions I just don't use. Every communication app I need works fine, as does every map and weather app.
I have zero issues with the Proton suite, OSMand, Slack, WhatsApp, Signal, Messenger, Authy, WeatherCan, Ring, TidesNearMe, Firefox, Foobar, Podcast Republic, Cx File, Newpipe, and more.
Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#34It has an IR blaster. Why is this the only phone I've seen in ages with an IR blaster? And the rest of its specs look decent, although the battery is a little poor and the lack of USB OTG is a bit unfortunate. Still, if it had decent 3rd-party ROM support I'd actually consider it.
Finally someone mentions software support. Android 12 is good now, but what about in a couple years?
Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#35Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#36You know, I like it. But using an on-screen keyboard on that would be exhausting. Also many apps are built with at least 5” screen real estate in mind - so with the keyboard up, I wonder if it would be annoying to type a response/comment. I know I struggled with an OG iPhone SE, and that experience is the source of my concern here. I imagine the target audience probably won’t write lengthy emails on this thing. Eithe…
I've used this phone for 1.5 years now. I've been pleasantly surprised at how many apps and websites work just fine with it. ... Actually, HN used to work fine and broke just a couple days ago (started making the text tiny and way too wide to view), and I'm not sure what happened. I have pretty small hands, and I find the on screen keyboard okay. I do make a lot more typos than I used to with a bigger phone, and type…
I think the stylesheet changed. This happened to me as well, I had to switch to a reader app.
I typically use Firefox on Android, Samsung (normal sized)
Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#37I have a Titan Pocket and just love it. Unihertz has also been a fantastic company to interact with: I broke my titan, walked into the ocean, and they replaced it for a small fraction of the purchase cost. I only wish the camera was better. That said, I think this Jelly looks like a good phone for my kids.
Do they have a waterproof version?
Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#38I bought a Jelly Pro a few years ago and I regretted it. I am part of an on-call schedule but I don't feel comfortable mingling personal devices and work apps and credentials. I wanted an inexpensive device that was small enough I could keep in my pocket with my personal devices. In return for wanting both "cheap" and "small" I was willing to compromise significantly on "performance." All I wanted it to do was to rec…
Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#39Re: Unihertz Jelly 2E – smartphone with 3“ screen
#40I bought a Jelly Pro a few years ago and I regretted it. I am part of an on-call schedule but I don't feel comfortable mingling personal devices and work apps and credentials. I wanted an inexpensive device that was small enough I could keep in my pocket with my personal devices. In return for wanting both "cheap" and "small" I was willing to compromise significantly on "performance." All I wanted it to do was to rec…
I think lots of apps probably wouldn't work on such a small screen now.
I am tempted to try using one of the new ones.