Live data from Hacker News

How Twitter broke Twitter

theincidentaleconomist.com

31–36 of 36 posts

Re: How Twitter broke Twitter

#32
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not really a command, just convention. If my tweet begins with @Permit, then it's only visible to the intersection of your and my followers, so somebody that follows me but not you would not see it. But if I start it with anything else (people have just adapted . as a convention, but it could be anything) then it's visible to ALL of my followers. Except, as this article explains, if I used the formal Reply butto…

I'm confused. I'm looking around at a few accounts and I see a LOT of them starting with @whatever where I do not follow the other person. Is this a setting somewhere? Did I completely misunderstand? And they show up whether or not I am logged in, whether or not I am following the person using @whatever. Are you sure this tweet-hiding applies when not using the Reply button?

Yeah, what abraham said. Sorry, that could've been clearer.

Re: How Twitter broke Twitter

#33
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not really a command, just convention. If my tweet begins with @Permit, then it's only visible to the intersection of your and my followers, so somebody that follows me but not you would not see it. But if I start it with anything else (people have just adapted . as a convention, but it could be anything) then it's visible to ALL of my followers. Except, as this article explains, if I used the formal Reply butto…

I'm confused. I'm looking around at a few accounts and I see a LOT of them starting with @whatever where I do not follow the other person. Is this a setting somewhere? Did I completely misunderstand? And they show up whether or not I am logged in, whether or not I am following the person using @whatever. Are you sure this tweet-hiding applies when not using the Reply button?

most of twitter's userbase is also confused

Re: How Twitter broke Twitter

#34
"Is your face starting to twitch yet?"

I'm a Twitter user, and I can guarantee that my face is not starting to twitch. Not from this news, at least, possibly from the coffee.

I see what he's getting at but I don't honestly think this warrants the sensational tone...

Re: How Twitter broke Twitter

#35
The real problem with Twitter and why it has only caught on to a smaller subset of the population than Facebook is that its interface and usage are not intuitive enough. This example is case-in-point.

Re: How Twitter broke Twitter

#36

This is disappointing. Twitter is great because it is so simple; they should pick the simplest behavior for any user action and stick with it so users can be fully aware of what every action does.

I agree. The real problem has nothing to do with tweets, it is about non-obvious, non-intuitive, obscure functionality with no clear way to learn.
Post reply on HN