Live data from Hacker News

Human Or Not: Guess if you're chatting with an AI or a Human

app.humanornot.ai

31–40 of 62 posts

Re: Human Or Not: Guess if you're chatting with an AI or a Human

#31

I suggest you set up the game as a discussion: men vs women, car vs airplane, dc vs marvel, ac vs dc? white chocolate vs dark chocolate. Both sides MUST attempt to sound intelligent. When time is up, the options should be: Human, AI, Wasn't trying.

Yes it needs a “wasn’t trying” option

Re: Human Or Not: Guess if you're chatting with an AI or a Human

#37

I suggest you set up the game as a discussion: men vs women, car vs airplane, dc vs marvel, ac vs dc? white chocolate vs dark chocolate. Both sides MUST attempt to sound intelligent. When time is up, the options should be: Human, AI, Wasn't trying.

No way. No rules is way harder for bots to win.

Re: Human Or Not: Guess if you're chatting with an AI or a Human

#39
post #14
post #10

This is a wonderful idea for an online game. But this can be improved. One human should be assigned impostor pre game. He should be awarded points if he successfully deceives the other human. Overall quality of responses will improve and it will be harder to tell them apart.

I think it’s very easy for a human to lie and behave like a chatbot. And the only defence against that is the incentive for both parties to focus on testing each other efficiently.

This is a hilarious inversion of the Turing test. It's supposed to be about the computer trying to act as intelligently as a human. Instead, we've got the humans gaming the system by acting as dumb as an AI.
Post reply on HN