Live data from Hacker News

Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

twitter.com

31–40 of 180 posts

Re: Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

#31
post #26

Imagine doing all that work to just hinge your fate on the least open, least aligned platform to your app's and app protocol's declared raison d'être. Do these people really believe that the cypherpunk ethos involves being an Apple bootlicker? I don't get it.

I mean anyone who would work on or with a google platform certainly isn’t. They’re the least cypherpunk, most bland and corporate, evil tech corp I can think of that makes consumer hardware outside of MAYBE Meta.

Re: Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

#32

https://twitter.com/siwatanejo/status/1668585129374289925

The only issue with this is: > I like crypto but think 99.999% of NFTs are scams It is more like 100% are scams, there is no NFT use case, it's all just jpgs.

The original idea behind NFTs is fine. Selling links to JPEGs was not the purpose.

I’ve seen them used sensibly for shipment tracking, and such like. They’re great for that.

Re: Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only issue with this is: > I like crypto but think 99.999% of NFTs are scams It is more like 100% are scams, there is no NFT use case, it's all just jpgs.

The original idea behind NFTs is fine. Selling links to JPEGs was not the purpose. I’ve seen them used sensibly for shipment tracking, and such like. They’re great for that.

> I’ve seen them used sensibly for shipment tracking.

Why do this when the current system already handles this? This is no unique usecase.

Re: Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only issue with this is: > I like crypto but think 99.999% of NFTs are scams It is more like 100% are scams, there is no NFT use case, it's all just jpgs.

The original idea behind NFTs is fine. Selling links to JPEGs was not the purpose. I’ve seen them used sensibly for shipment tracking, and such like. They’re great for that.

Could you elaborate? There are a lot of proposed NFT usecases that sound superficially useful (e.g. magically preventing secondary sales of event tickets), but don't actually solve any real problems when you think about it properly.

Re: Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

#36
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only issue with this is: > I like crypto but think 99.999% of NFTs are scams It is more like 100% are scams, there is no NFT use case, it's all just jpgs.

Technically ENS names are NFTs, I'd say that's a non-scam use case equivalent to domain names.

Yes, domain names have existed since forever, but I don't see how crypto domain names are any different or changes anything.

Does a domain name need a token attached to the service in order to operate?

I would say it is still a scam as it is airdropping ENS tokens that were minted out of thin air and insiders pump and dumping the token to make a profit.

You can't do that illegal stuff with traditional domain names.

Re: Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

#37
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MS was fined because it had an enormous market share in personal computing, making it practically a monopoly. Apple is nowhere near that.

Apple has a sizable share of the mobile market in the USA and EU and what they are doing goes well beyond what MS did in the past.

As far as EU jurisdiction goes the only stat that matters is the EU. If Apple had 100% of market share in the US, the EU would still have no governing power.

Based off what I found through a quick search, in Q4 2022 Apple has 29% of smartphone shipment and they have about 38% of mobile OS share. Not tiny, but not dominating the market. Back when Microsoft was being prosecuted, they had >95% of desktop OS share, approaching 99% in some places, and they were accused of leveraging that to muscle out paid-for software vendors that sold directly competing software (both operating systems through exclusivity agreements with OEMs and application software on Windows).

Re: Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

#38
post #20

I can't believe the EU, which has fined Microsoft because of having IE as the default browser, is OK with Apple having a total walled garden in iOS. Which by the way only has one "browser", because other browsers are forced to use the safari engine.

A bunch of bureaucrats somehow outsmarting one of the most well resourced and talented machineries out there is the thing I am skeptical about. The two systems are not equal by a long shot.

I don't think calling the EU "a bunch of bureaucrats" is accurate.

I also love how "bureaucrat" ended up meaning "any government body which does stuff I don't like"

Re: Apple to Remove Nostr Damus from App Store for Bitcoin Tipping Feature

#39
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The original idea behind NFTs is fine. Selling links to JPEGs was not the purpose. I’ve seen them used sensibly for shipment tracking, and such like. They’re great for that.

Could you elaborate? There are a lot of proposed NFT usecases that sound superficially useful (e.g. magically preventing secondary sales of event tickets), but don't actually solve any real problems when you think about it properly.

The use case that I am most familiar with (just from reading about) was to allow artists to sell digital work derived real work, and have them benefit financially from any resale of that digital work. Not sure if there's a non-NFT way to accomplish the same.
Post reply on HN