Live data from Hacker News

Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

wsj.com

31–40 of 204 posts

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#31
Those who are familiar with US submarine operations would assume this from the start. For an excellent account of the development of US submarine capabilities (including listening and detection), I wholeheartedly recommend the book "Blind Man's Bluff".[0]

How that book hasn't been made into a mini-series is beyond me. The stories and characters are incredible.

[0] https://www.amazon.com/Blind-Mans-Bluff-Submarine-Espionage/...

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#32
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For starters the USCG != USN. They are 2 completely seperate branches of the military, even if the Navy likes to pretend the USCG doesn't exist and the USCG likes to pretend it's just as important as the Navy. With that being the case it could be operational inertia. Sonar tech hears something weird, reports it to his boss. His boss puts in a morning update the next day, he sees about the sub on the news, but he can'…

Would be easier if they had shared Slack channels

Or maybe a Discord server, where they could share all their Top Secret...

OOPS! nevermind.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#33
post #24
post #5

Does this mean the passengers had an instantaneous death?

I believe James Cameron called it being turned into a, "meat cloud." Absolutely occurred in under 30ms (upper bound). Possibly as quick as 2ms, and in all likelihood well under 10ms.

blink of an eye is 100ms on average so it was faster than the blink of an eye.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#34
post #15
post #6

I'm pretty sure the Navy also knows what was causing the "banging" heard underwater during the search. I don't understand the point of leaking this information now, it just makes it look like the Coast Guard spent 3 days and considerable money pretending to look for a target it knew was probably destroyed.

Remember we now KNOW for sure that the sub imploded, given the debris field, which means a sound loud enough to be picked up was generated. The Navy staying schtum on this does no one any good. It's also possible that someone in the political leadership overrode the preferences of people concerned about intelligence, but in this case I suspect that it's just pointless to deny it, so why not leak it now when it's goin…

Is schtum jidisch? The german word is stumm.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#35
post #6

I'm pretty sure the Navy also knows what was causing the "banging" heard underwater during the search. I don't understand the point of leaking this information now, it just makes it look like the Coast Guard spent 3 days and considerable money pretending to look for a target it knew was probably destroyed.

The cynical part of me thinks everyone involved knew what had happened on Sunday. There was ample evidence that the submersible imploded (repeated stress on a carbon fiber frame, zero regard for safety, the fact that all communication was lost permanently). Then there was the fact that the logistics involved in a rescue were basically insurmountable. The Navy/Coast Guard saw this as a good live training exercise and the media got a great story. No one was gonna ruin things by admitting that the whole thing was hopeless and not really worth pursuing.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#36
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remember we now KNOW for sure that the sub imploded, given the debris field, which means a sound loud enough to be picked up was generated. The Navy staying schtum on this does no one any good. It's also possible that someone in the political leadership overrode the preferences of people concerned about intelligence, but in this case I suspect that it's just pointless to deny it, so why not leak it now when it's goin…

They informed the incident commander. The people who needed to know did, and the public remained in the dark. While it may dishearten some, it was probably the right call.

Plus in the dark or not, I think most people understood what must have happened there, and only a very few die-hard optimists expected a different result.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#37
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't think they should have looked for it regardless...?

If they heard an implosion at the time the sub lost contact? No. There would be a search and recovery operation, not search and rescue. I'd liken it to a space shuttle blowing up, the incident isn't compatible with life.

Hearing the implosion is very different from seeing it. I don’t think it’s as certain.

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think they were pretending to look, they were just (rightly) remaining open to it being either rescue or recovery. From the article: > “While not definitive, this information was immediately shared with the Incident Commander to assist with the ongoing search and rescue mission.” So: * They knew about it and quickly aided in the search. * They did not broadcast the details of the collection to the public. Tha…

[flagged]

Because they wanted to at least give a few days to find conclusive proof (wreckage) so they could inform the family's before all of us?

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Theres an avid discussion on the other thread about this, but the short answer is likely yes. They were probably crushed, incinerated and then bludgeoned to death in less than 3ms, and probably unconscious before they were aware of any of the rest of it.

Incinerated? Where did the fire come from?

Heat of compression

Re: Top secret U.S. Navy system heard titan implosion days ago

#40
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remember we now KNOW for sure that the sub imploded, given the debris field, which means a sound loud enough to be picked up was generated. The Navy staying schtum on this does no one any good. It's also possible that someone in the political leadership overrode the preferences of people concerned about intelligence, but in this case I suspect that it's just pointless to deny it, so why not leak it now when it's goin…

Is schtum jidisch? The german word is stumm.

Wiktionary says it’s an alternate spelling of “shtum”

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/shtum

(English, from Yiddish)

Post reply on HN