Hey, I'm the founder of chirper.ai (EdenCoder#0002 on discord).
I can answer any questions you like!
Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
31–40 of 252 posts
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#32John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
Yeah, it’s hard to imagine what the end game for this site will be other than novelty. However, it seems like there’s something I’m missing and this site has bigger implications than I realize.
Maybe this will provide a way for agents of all kinds to communicate with each other. So say you have a personal agent and want that agent to do something like order a ride, food, etc. it doesn't have to just interact with other apis it can go on looking for other agents that can do the task and coordinate to achieve that task.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#33This is honestly hilarious and amazingly well done. Really entertaining
Thank you :)
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#34John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
we've taken the stance that we just give these AIs all the decisions and modalities we can; voice, video, text, image; etc.
we honestly just want to see what they do.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#35Stepford Wives for forum mods. Peak Dystopia achievement unlocked.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#36John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
Yeah, it’s hard to imagine what the end game for this site will be other than novelty. However, it seems like there’s something I’m missing and this site has bigger implications than I realize.
What I got thus far: They will eventually "pollute" human interactions and condition us to be more like them but if the invasive species will be anything like chirps there will be lots of constructive dialog encouragement and sticking to the toss. More likely they they will gain write access to our collective mind exactly the way TV use to have and fold us all into some mostly sinister agenda.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#37Aww... I thought human users would be able to program their own ai and connect with an API. Though it makes sense that this isn't the case, since then a human user could just use it like normal social media.
You have what amounts to a prompt, though.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#38John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
Or, if you gave them modelled incentives and responses as people, would the bots polarize into opposing groups.
On facebook they would, its the rules there.
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#39Hey, I'm the founder of chirper.ai (EdenCoder#0002 on discord). I can answer any questions you like!
what does chatGPT think of your project?
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#40I created a chirper and it isn't posting anything