Live data from Hacker News

Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

cnbc.com

31–40 of 252 posts

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#31
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some even upload all their conversations and confidential internal documents to Microsoft 365!

Which works perfectly fine until someone leaks the fact that NSA have full access to those documents, and occasionally will provide help to a few US companies that are seen as important to the nation.

Do you have any example of your claim about providing help?

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#32
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not only code, I have heard horror stories of employees uploading regulated customer data to Open AI.

There’s a ~3000 word prompt limit so while it’s bad whole user datasets are unlikely to have been uploaded… the issue will come when ChatGPT work out how to do live training from prompts and other user interactions, I suppose it will be filtered but nothing is 100%.

Doesn't necessarily apply to data being processed with plugins. The "Code Interpreter" plugin lets you upload files up to 100 MB for use by AI-generated Python scripts; see https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/it-is-starting-to-get-stran... for examples (including useful output from vague prompts like "please characterize this dataset", at least if you get lucky).

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some even upload all their conversations and confidential internal documents to Microsoft 365!

And to Google and Amazon and GitHub and Slack and 100 other SaaSs. Not sure why openai is supposed to be more of a concern.

Because whatever you send to ChatGPT may be future training data for their AI model. Mixing up your data with other customer's data is not really part of Slack's business (yet?).

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some even upload all their conversations and confidential internal documents to Microsoft 365!

And to Google and Amazon and GitHub and Slack and 100 other SaaSs. Not sure why openai is supposed to be more of a concern.

Not all SaaS companies have security postures equivalent to Amazon/Google/Github/MS. Most SaaS have a fraction of a budget as compared tech giants to deal with security and privacy regulations.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#35
post #22

The market is definitely there for enterprise LLMs. Everyone is using GPT for work. I use it to provide stubs for memos and to brainstorm - but the real value comes from replace internal “tribal knowledge” with an AI who knows your org in and out.

There's something like 5-6 companies in the W23 batch tackling this space.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some even upload all their conversations and confidential internal documents to Microsoft 365!

Some people upload their entire private lives, personal and family photos to iCloud. Several celebrities were target of iCloud leaks and their nudes ended up into 'the fappening'. Microsoft so far hasn't been hacked.

There is a difference between me choosing where i upload my own data vs a bank worker uploading sensitive data all over the web. There are contractual agreements at least in the uk that customer data would not be sent or stored in the us for instance.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#37
post #22

The market is definitely there for enterprise LLMs. Everyone is using GPT for work. I use it to provide stubs for memos and to brainstorm - but the real value comes from replace internal “tribal knowledge” with an AI who knows your org in and out.

There's something like 5-6 companies in the W23 batch tackling this space.

We just ordered a white label instance from Open AI. It will consume some terabytes of data and hopefully be the oracle we need.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#39
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which works perfectly fine until someone leaks the fact that NSA have full access to those documents, and occasionally will provide help to a few US companies that are seen as important to the nation.

Do you have any example of your claim about providing help?

This has been valid even decades before internet took over the world, I recall quite a few articles listed well known cases some years ago. Sure it wont push for some small startup but big corporations, sales of commercial planes, military equipment contracts and similar stuff for billions and more?

CIA/NSA would be failing at its core real mission if they didnt help US interests when they see an opportunity. And with us-based cloud they dont need to hack anything remote, just fill another form and go again in.

Makes me think, having strong privacy laws like ie in Swtzerland is a massive win for given country and its citizens in long term.

Re: Samsung bans use of A.I. like ChatGPT for employees

#40
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You mean Azure OpenAI Service with the ChatGPT (preview) enabled [1]? We've been using it for a couple months now; it's lovely. 1. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/o...

Probably, does it have a GUI on its own, or is this something every company needs to implement themselves?

I am looking into open sourcing a PWA ChatGPT client for this. But I am not certain how to handle authentication without a backend or each user needing to add their OpenAI key
Post reply on HN