Live data from Hacker News

Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

youtube.com

31–40 of 62 posts

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#31
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now it's at $100k!!!!!

At that price you could put someone through a glass blowing course and then have them work for a few months making thousands of these for you.

It is intentionally priced “not to sell”, so the price should be irrational.

Still wouldn’t be too surprised though if someone bought it.

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#32

Destin has a knack for taking relatively mundane topics and making them interesting. I’ve had low expectations going into his videos on coast guard search patterns, center-pivot irrigators, and a film factory tour, but ended up enjoying them because of his emphasis on the little optimizations that are inherent in all human endeavors, and the people who carry them out. It’s like Dirty Jobs (which I also liked) but for…

The Kodak factory series is especially fantastic.

True, very underrated

But in general I think Destin's latest videos have been a bit "trying too hard" and everything is "genius" etc

It's all "Prince Rupert's drop" or "Non-newtonian fluid" (and Oobleck is the only one they know about) or "Air cannon" or "shooting slow motion". It's the same topics going in a circle.

(But do watch the coast guard videos if you want to know how to whistle)

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#33
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Does it all have to be 30 minutes though? Not just him to be sure but I’m not a fan of YouTube’s crusade to incentivize long form content which just seems to have made everyone pad out every topic as much as they can. Very rare have I seen 30 minute videos that truly deserve that time commitment.

I watched it at 2.25x to cut it down to ~13m, but even at that speed I agree a lot of videos are unnecessarily dragged out.

If I recall correctly there's a certain length videos need to be to get adverts or to be monetised - something like ~10 minutes. So while this one is a little bit played out (maybe this happens to get an extra set of ads in the middle) the worst are when you have 2-3 minutes of information streeeeeetched out to 10 minutes.

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#34
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a reason early Model T's are collectibles, and why 1980s Ford Escorts are in junkyards.

I think Ford Escort means something different here in the UK. They've gone up in value hugely in the last 20 years and are generally worth a lot more than Model T Fords now. (Annoyingly they're worth much more than a contemporary Porsche 944, which was much more desirable when new. Annoyingly because I own a 944 and not an Escort). https://www.silverstoneauctions.com/1980-ford-escort-rec0351... https://www.evoke-clas…

In fairness, that's the RS2000 which is definitely not a regular ford escort. An ordinary 1980 ford escort isn't worth anything like that much. Maybe 1/10th of the price if in really good condition.

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Kodak factory series is especially fantastic.

True, very underrated But in general I think Destin's latest videos have been a bit "trying too hard" and everything is "genius" etc It's all "Prince Rupert's drop" or "Non-newtonian fluid" (and Oobleck is the only one they know about) or "Air cannon" or "shooting slow motion". It's the same topics going in a circle. (But do watch the coast guard videos if you want to know how to whistle)

They always use shear-thickening fluids because they're so counterintuitive, but shear-thinning fluids are a fun example of a mixed blessing — the same property that keeps paint from dripping off a brush/roller until you apply it is also what makes it so hard to pour the right amount of ketchup.

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#36
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True, very underrated But in general I think Destin's latest videos have been a bit "trying too hard" and everything is "genius" etc It's all "Prince Rupert's drop" or "Non-newtonian fluid" (and Oobleck is the only one they know about) or "Air cannon" or "shooting slow motion". It's the same topics going in a circle. (But do watch the coast guard videos if you want to know how to whistle)

They always use shear-thickening fluids because they're so counterintuitive, but shear-thinning fluids are a fun example of a mixed blessing — the same property that keeps paint from dripping off a brush/roller until you apply it is also what makes it so hard to pour the right amount of ketchup.

Yeah, true. The ketchup one I don't think it's "on purpose" (hence why it's annoying)

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think Ford Escort means something different here in the UK. They've gone up in value hugely in the last 20 years and are generally worth a lot more than Model T Fords now. (Annoyingly they're worth much more than a contemporary Porsche 944, which was much more desirable when new. Annoyingly because I own a 944 and not an Escort). https://www.silverstoneauctions.com/1980-ford-escort-rec0351... https://www.evoke-clas…

In fairness, that's the RS2000 which is definitely not a regular ford escort. An ordinary 1980 ford escort isn't worth anything like that much. Maybe 1/10th of the price if in really good condition.

Find me a regular Mk1 or Mk2 Escort in really good condition, and I will gladly pay you £3126.

Even the boring models command ridiculous values now: https://www.classiccarsforsale.co.uk/ford/escort/351743

For £6750 you can have one in really bad condition and with the steering wheel on the wrong side: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/234972695631

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#38
post #3

Dustin’s high speed videos are an incredible treasure trove of science and engineering to learn from.

Does it all have to be 30 minutes though? Not just him to be sure but I’m not a fan of YouTube’s crusade to incentivize long form content which just seems to have made everyone pad out every topic as much as they can. Very rare have I seen 30 minute videos that truly deserve that time commitment.

I love everyone that claims YT forcing X...

Almost everyone that claims that is wrong...

I prefer 15-45min videos, I hate both the Trend to 3-4hr "streams" and the "we gotta beat tiktok" vertical video shorts...

//sidenote... Bring back the 00's where people were shamed for posting vertical video....

Re: Prince Rupert's Drop vs Molten Glass [video]

#40

Dustin’s high speed videos are an incredible treasure trove of science and engineering to learn from.

I have a hard time know he works in weapons of war for a living.

I'm curious why.

Are you thinking that it's wrong / evil for a country to maintain an effective military?

Post reply on HN