Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

spacenews.com

31–40 of 189 posts

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#31

Press releases from SpaceX have alluded to a possible launch date of 420, which I think would be hilariously on brand.

How fucking lame, especially for a company that drug tests.

Why do you immediately jump to drugs as a conclusion?

Maybe they just want to commemorate the birthday of the visionary leader who recognized and funded the genius inventor that ultimately ended up being instrumental in getting the American space program of the ground?

/s

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#32

Press releases from SpaceX have alluded to a possible launch date of 420, which I think would be hilariously on brand.

How fucking lame, especially for a company that drug tests.

Putting a rocket into orbit requires a good understanding of science and reality. There is no actual scientific proof that occasionally using marijuana is a bad thing that would make a potential employee a bad employee.

Maybe politicians don't like that reality, but they are not the ones putting people into orbit.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#33
post #5
post #3

A rocket size comparison video [1] [1] https://twitter.com/Rainmaker1973/status/1602270207287902209

Two big take-aways from this video: - Half the size of the statue of liberty is it's base. Not that tall as a statue. - Seadragon, of which I'd never heard. 1) 1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_Dragon_(rocket)

I think it is highly unfair to compare concepts to actual built rockets, might as well just include the Enterprise from Star Trek as well at that point.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#34
post #28

Press releases from SpaceX have alluded to a possible launch date of 420, which I think would be hilariously on brand.

Can we please come up with some new "funny numbers" than 420, 69 and 42.

1337 has been around for some time ^_|

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#35
post #15

What could prevent them from getting a launch license? What’s the FAA considering in approving or denying a request like this?

Essentially, environmental/safety checklists... but it seems unlikely they'll get browbeaten because they're pretty critical to US space superiority.

Never assume that the wheels of the US federal bureaucracy are moving in sync.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#36
post #18

Whether or not they hit April specifically (some of which isn't under their control, freak weather or the like can happen) they've clearly been checking through prep at an impressive, disciplined pace and it'll be soon. And importantly once they start they've set things up to keep the iteration going and do more and more ironing things out, and then going into full production. All technical merits aside, that , mass…

True. When the Artemis test launches were being scrubbed it really felt like an all-or-nothing moment. Even thought it was a rocket designed to be a disposable test article, it felt like failure would have necessitated a review of the whole program.

With the upcoming starship test, it feels like even if it ends up being a 100 meter firework, the engine is still purring.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#37
post #18

Whether or not they hit April specifically (some of which isn't under their control, freak weather or the like can happen) they've clearly been checking through prep at an impressive, disciplined pace and it'll be soon. And importantly once they start they've set things up to keep the iteration going and do more and more ironing things out, and then going into full production. All technical merits aside, that , mass…

Gwynne Shotwell has said that SpaceX is a rocket factory company, not a rocket company. I agree entirely, the possibilities here make me so excited.

Re: SpaceX closing in on first Starship Super Heavy launch

#38

Press releases from SpaceX have alluded to a possible launch date of 420, which I think would be hilariously on brand.

How fucking lame, especially for a company that drug tests.

Joking around is fun and mostly free :)
Post reply on HN